深层海相页岩气立体开发

doi:10.7623/syxb202408005

石油学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 1219-1233.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202408005

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇

深层海相页岩气立体开发"甜点"岩相及其成因机制——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例

武瑾^1,2, 郭为^1,2, 郭伟^1,2, 赵圣贤³, 苟其勇³, 曾凡成⁴, 刘宇⁴, 邹晓品⁴, 王玉满^1,2, 刘兆龙^1,2

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083;
2. 国家能源页岩气研发(实验)中心北京 100083;
3. 中国石油西南油气田公司页岩气研究院四川成都 610051;
4. 中国石油吉林油田公司川南天然气开发事业部(一体化中心) 吉林松原 138000

收稿日期:2024-03-07 修回日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-09-04
通讯作者: 武瑾，女，1988年12月生，2020年获成都理工大学博士学位，现为中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师，主要从事页岩气开发地质研究工作。Email:wujinouc@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:武瑾，女，1988年12月生，2020年获成都理工大学博士学位，现为中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师，主要从事页岩气开发地质研究工作。Email:wujinouc@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气集团有限公司科技专项“页岩油气富集机理与储层地质力学评价技术研究”(2024DJ87)资助。

Sweet spot lithofacies and its genesis mechanism for stereoscopic development of deep marine shale: a case study of the first submember of Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Luzhou area, southern Sichuan Basin

Wu Jin^1,2, Guo Wei^1,2, Guo Wei^1,2, Zhao Shengxian³, Gou Qiyong³, Zeng Fancheng⁴, Liu Yu⁴, Zou Xiaopin⁴, Wang Yuman^1,2, Liu Zhaolong^1,2

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
2. National Energy Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment)Center, Beijing 100083, China;
3. Shale Gas Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Sichuan Chengdu 610051, China;
4. Chuannan Gas Development Division, PetroChina Jilin Oilfield Company, Jilin Songyuan 138000, China

Received:2024-03-07 Revised:2024-05-25 Published:2024-09-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 页岩岩相控制着页岩的生烃潜力、储集性能以及可压裂性。基于岩心观察结果,综合利用岩石薄片鉴定、X射线衍射(XRD)矿物分析、场发射扫描电镜(FE-SEM)成像、X射线荧光光谱(XRF)元素扫描、主量/微量元素测试等技术手段,对四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段(龙一段)一亚段上部开发层系(上层系)页岩岩相进行了系统研究。研究结果表明,龙一段一亚段上层系主要发育高TOC含泥硅质页岩(S1)岩相、高TOC硅泥混合页岩(CM1)岩相、中TOC含泥硅质页岩(S2)岩相、中TOC硅泥混合页岩(CM2)岩相、中TOC混合页岩(M2)岩相和低TOC硅泥混合页岩(CM3)岩相6种岩相。其中,S1岩相和CM1岩相为龙一段一亚段上层系"甜点"岩相类型。S1岩相主要发育于龙一段一亚段4小层底部和龙一段一亚段6小层下部,有机质丰度高,有机孔及微裂缝发育,脆性矿物含量高,现场测试其含气量最高,为最优岩相类型;CM1岩相主要发育于龙一段一亚段6小层中—下部,有机质丰度高,黏土矿物晶间孔、有机孔及微裂缝发育,现场测试其含气量较高,为次优岩相类型。海平面升降、火山事件以及上升洋流共同控制着泸州区块龙一段一亚段上层系"甜点"岩相的形成。Ce元素含量异常表明,海平面小幅上升造成底层水中溶解的氧浓度降低,同时火山喷发的火山灰释放大量营养元素,以及上升洋流带来的深海富营养水体,共同促使表层海水中海洋生物生产力提高,形成了一套富有机质的硅质、硅泥混合页岩,并在成岩过程中发育了大量微孔隙和微裂缝。

关键词: 深层页岩气, 立体开发, "甜点"岩相, 储层特征, 龙马溪组, 四川盆地

Abstract: Lithofacies control the hydrocarbon generation potential, reservoir property and fracturability of shales. Based on core observations, comprehensively using the techniques such as rock thin sections identification, X-ray diffraction mineral analysis, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) imaging, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) element scanning and major element and microelement testing, the study systematically investigates the shale lithofacies of the upper layer series of development in the first submember of Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation (Long1 Member) in Luzhou area of Sichuan Basin. The results show that the study area mainly develops six lithofacies, i.e., high TOC siliceous shale (S1), high TOC siliceous clay mixed shale (CM1), medium TOC siliceous mud shale (S2), medium TOC siliceous clay mixed shale (CM2), medium TOC mixed shale (M2) and low TOC siliceous clay mixed shale (CM3). Among them, S1 and CM1 are the sweet spot lithofacies of the upper layers in the first submember of Long1 Member. S1 lithofacies is mainly developed at the bottom of the fourth layer and the lower part of the sixth layer in the first submember of Long1 Member, characterized with high organic matter, developed organic matter pores and microcracks, high content of brittle minerals, and the highest gas content, which is classified as the optimal lithofacies type. CM1 lithofacies is mainly developed in the middle and lower parts of the sixth layer in the first submember of Long1 Member, characterized with high organic matter, well-developed intergranular pores of clay minerals, organic matter pores and microcracks, as well as high gas content, which is classified as the suboptimal lithofacies type. The formation of sweet spot lithofacies is jointly controlled by sea level changes, volcanism and upwelling ocean currents. Ce anomalies indicate that a slight rise in sea level causes a decrease in dissolved oxygen concentration in the bottom water. Meanwhile, volcanic ashes release a lot of nutrient elements, and the upwelling ocean currents can provide eutrophic water bodies, thus promoting the marine biological productivity in surface sea water, and forming a set of organic-rich siliceous shale and siliceous clay mixed shale. Moreover, a large number of micro pores and micro cracks were developed during the diagenesis process of the shales.

Key words: deep shale gas, stereoscopic development, sweet spot lithofacies, reservoir characteristics, Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

TE122.2

武瑾, 郭为, 郭伟, 赵圣贤, 苟其勇, 曾凡成, 刘宇, 邹晓品, 王玉满, 刘兆龙. 深层海相页岩气立体开发"甜点"岩相及其成因机制——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1219-1233.

Wu Jin, Guo Wei, Guo Wei, Zhao Shengxian, Gou Qiyong, Zeng Fancheng, Liu Yu, Zou Xiaopin, Wang Yuman, Liu Zhaolong. Sweet spot lithofacies and its genesis mechanism for stereoscopic development of deep marine shale: a case study of the first submember of Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Luzhou area, southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(8): 1219-1233.

参考文献

[1] 孙焕泉, 蔡勋育, 胡德高, 等. 页岩气立体开发理论技术与实践——以四川盆地涪陵页岩气田为例[J].石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(3):573-584.
SUN Huanquan, CAI Xunyu, HU Degao, et al.Theory, technology and practice of shale gas three-dimensional development:a case study of Fuling shale gas field in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(3):573-584.
[2] ALIMAHOMED F, MALPANI R, JOSE R, et al.Development of the stacked pay in the Delaware Basin, Permian Basin[C]//Proceedings of the 6th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference.Houston, Texas:AAPG, 2018.
[3] 杨洪志, 赵圣贤, 夏自强, 等.四川盆地南部泸州区块深层页岩气立体开发目标优选[J].天然气工业, 2022, 42(8):162-174.
YANG Hongzhi, ZHAO Shengxian, XIA Ziqiang, et al.Target selection of tridimensional development of deep shale gas in the Luzhou region, South Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(8):162-174.
[4] 端祥刚, 吴建发, 张晓伟, 等.四川盆地海相页岩气提高采收率研究进展与关键问题[J].石油学报, 2022, 43(8):1185-1200.
DUAN Xianggang, WU Jianfa, ZHANG Xiaowei, et al.Progress and key issues in the study of enhanced recovery of marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(8):1185-1200.
[5] 姜鹏飞, 吴建发, 朱逸青, 等.四川盆地海相页岩气富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J].石油学报, 2023, 44(1):91-109.
JIANG Pengfei, WU Jianfa, ZHU Yiqing, et al.Enrichment conditions and favorable areas for exploration and development of marine shale gas in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1):91-109.
[6] 何骁, 陈更生, 吴建发, 等.四川盆地南部地区深层页岩气勘探开发新进展与挑战[J].天然气工业, 2022, 42(8):24-34.
HE Xiao, CHEN Gengsheng, WU Jianfa, et al.Deep shale gas exploration and development in the southern Sichuan Basin:new progress and challenges[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(8):24-34.
[7] 武瑾, 李海, 杨学锋, 等.深层海相页岩纹层类型、组合及其对储层品质的影响——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例[J].石油学报, 2023, 44(9):1517-1531.
WU Jin, LI Hai, YANG Xuefeng, et al.Tyoes and combinations of deep marine shale laminae and their effects on reservoir quality:a case study of the first submember of Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Luzhou block, south Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(9):1517-1531.
[8] 杨洪志, 赵圣贤, 刘勇, 等.泸州区块深层页岩气富集高产主控因素[J].天然气工业, 2019, 39(11):55-63.
YANG Hongzhi, ZHAO Shengxian, LIU Yong, et al.Main controlling factors of enrichment and high-yield of deep shale gas in the Luzhou block, southern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(11):55-63.
[9] 包汉勇, 梁榜, 郑爱维, 等.地质工程一体化在涪陵页岩气示范区立体勘探开发中的应用[J].中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(1):88-98.
BAO Hanyong, LIANG Bang, ZHENG Aiwei, et al.Application of geology and engineering integration in stereoscopic exploration and development of Fuling shale gas demonstration area[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(1):88-98.
[10] 孙焕泉, 周德华, 蔡勋育, 等.中国石化页岩气发展现状与趋势[J].中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2):14-26.
SUN Huanquan, ZHOU Dehua, CAI Xunyu, et al.Progress and prospect of shale gas development of Sinopec[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2):14-26.
[11] 武瑾, 王红岩, 施振生, 等.海陆过渡相黑色页岩优势岩相类型及成因机制——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘二叠系山西组为例[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(6):1137-1149.
WU Jin, WANG Hongyan, SHI Zhensheng, et al.Favorable lithofacies types and genesis of marine-continental transitional black shale:a case study of Permian Shanxi Formation in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin, NW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(6):1137-1149.
[12] 吴松涛, 朱如凯, 罗忠, 等.中国中西部盆地典型陆相页岩纹层结构与储层品质评价[J].中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(5):62-72.
WU Songtao, ZHU Rukai, LUO Zhong, et al.Laminar structure of typical continental shales and reservoir quality evaluation in central-western basins in China[J].China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(5):62-72.
[13] 孙龙德, 赵文智, 刘合, 等.页岩油"甜点"概念及其应用讨论[J].石油学报, 2023, 44(1):1-13.
SUN Longde, ZHAO Wenzhi, LIU He, et al.Concept and application of "sweet spot" in shale oil[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1):1-13.
[14] 周安富, 谢伟, 邱峋晰, 等.泸州区块龙一14小层页岩气勘探开发潜力[J].特种油气藏, 2022, 29(6):20-28.
ZHOU Anfu, XIE Wei, QIU Xunxi, et al.On exploration and development potential of shale gas in Longyi14 sub-bed in Luzhou block[J].Special Oil & Gas Reserviors, 2022, 29(6):20-28.
[15] 余凯, 鲜成钢, 文恒, 等.昭通国家级示范区浅层页岩气立体开发探索:以海坝背斜南翼YS203H1平台为例[J].地球科学, 2023, 48(1):252-266.
YU Kai, XIAN Chenggang, WEN Heng, et al.Stereoscopic development exploration of shallow shale gas in Zhaotong national shale gas demonstration area:case study of YS203H1 pad of Haiba anticline southern limb[J].Earth Science, 2023, 48(1):252-266.
[16] HAQ B U, SCHUTTER S R.A chronology of Paleozoic sea-level changes[J].Science, 2008, 322(5898):64-68.
[17] 王玉满, 陈波, 李新景, 等.川东北地区下志留统龙马溪组上升洋流相页岩沉积特征[J].石油学报, 2018, 39(10):1092-1102.
WANG Yuman, CHEN Bo, LI Xinjing, et al.Sedimentary characteristics of upwelling facies shale in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation, northeast Sichuan area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(10):1092-1102.
[18] 赵文智, 李建忠, 杨涛, 等.中国南方海相页岩气成藏差异性比较与意义[J].石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(4):499-510.
ZHAO Wenzhi, LI Jianzhong, YANG Tao, et al.Geological difference and its significance of marine shale gases in South China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(4):499-510.
[19] YAWAR Z, SCHIEBER J.On the origin of silt laminae in laminated shales[J].Sedimentary Geology, 2017, 360:22-34.
[20] 柳波, 石佳欣, 付晓飞, 等.陆相泥页岩层系岩相特征与页岩油富集条件——以松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组一段富有机质泥页岩为例[J].石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5):828-838.
LIU Bo, SHI Jiaxin, FU Xiaofei, et al.Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary system:a case study of organic-rich shale in first Member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong sag, Songliao Basin, NE China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5):828-838.
[21] POMMER M, MILLIKEN K.Pore types and pore-size distributions across thermal maturity, Eagle Ford Formation, southern Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2015, 99(9):1713-1744.
[22] 何治亮, 聂海宽, 胡东风, 等.深层页岩气有效开发中的地质问题——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(4):379-391.
HE Zhiliang, NIE Haikuan, HU Dongfeng, et al.Geological problems in the effective development of deep shale gas:a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi formations in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(4):379-391.
[23] 邱振, 卢斌, 陈振宏, 等.火山灰沉积与页岩有机质富集关系探讨——以五峰组—龙马溪组含气页岩为例[J].沉积学报, 2019, 37(6):1296-1308.
QIU Zhen, LU Bin, CHEN Zhenhong, et al.Discussion of the relationship between volcanic ash layers and organic enrichment of black shale:a case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi gas shales in the Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(6):1296-1308.
[24] YANG Shengchao, HU Wenxuan, WANG Xiaolin.Mechanism and implications of upwelling from the Late Ordovician to Early Silurian in the Yangtze region, South China[J].Chemical Geology, 2021, 565:120074.
[25] 朱如凯, 李梦莹, 杨静儒, 等.细粒沉积学研究进展与发展方向[J].石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(2):251-264.
ZHU Rukai, LI Mengying, YANG Jingru, et al.Advances and trends of fine-grained sedimentology[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(2):251-264.
[26] CHEN Xu, RONG Jiayu, LI Yue, et al.Facies patterns and geography of the Yangtze region, South China, through the Ordovician and Silurian transition[J].Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2004, 204(3/4):353-372.
[27] WILDE P, QUINBY-HUNT M S, ERDTMANN B D.The whole-rock cerium anomaly:a potential indicator of eustatic sea-level changes in shales of the anoxic facies[J].Sedimentary Geology, 1996, 101(1/2):43-53.
[28] 冯洪真, ERDTMANN B D, 王海峰.上扬子区早古生代全岩Ce异常与海平面长缓变化[J].中国科学D辑, 2000, 30(1):66-72.
FENG Hongzhen, ERDTMANN B D, WANG Haifeng.Early Paleozoic whole rock Ce anomalies and gradual changes in sea level in the Upper Yangtze region[J].Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 2000, 43(3):328-336.
[29] 苏文博, 李志明, 史晓颖, 等.华南五峰组—龙马溪组与华北下马岭组的钾质斑脱岩及黑色岩系——两个地史转折期板块构造运动的沉积响应[J].地学前缘, 2006, 13(6):82-95.
SU Wenbo, LI Zhiming, SHI Xiaoying, et al.K-bentonites and black shales from the Wufeng-Longmaxi formations (Early Paleozoic, South China) and Xiamaling Formation (Early Neoproterozoic, North China) implications for tectonic processes during two important transitions[J].Earth Science Frontiers, 2006, 13(6):82-95.
[30] SU Wenbo, HUFF W D, ETTENSOHN F R, et al.K-bentonite, black-shale and flysch successions at the Ordovician-Silurian transition, South China:possible sedimentary responses to the accretion of Cathaysia to the Yangtze block and its implications for the evolution of Gondwana[J].Gondwana Research, 2009, 15(1): 111-130.
[31] 舒逸, 陆永潮, 刘占红, 等.海相页岩中斑脱岩发育特征及对页岩储层品质的影响——以涪陵地区五峰组—龙马溪组一段为例[J].石油学报, 2017, 38(12):1371-1380.
SHU Yi, LU Yongchao, LIU Zhanhong, et al.Development characteristics of bentonite in marine shale and its effect on shale reservoir quality:a case study of Wufeng Formation to Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation, Fuling area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(12):1371-1380.
[32] 张尚锋, 许光彩, 朱锐, 等.上升流沉积的研究现状和发展趋势[J].石油天然气学报, 2012, 34(1):7-11.
ZHANG Shangfeng, XU Guangcai, ZHU Rui, et al.Research status and development tendency of upwelling sediments[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2012, 34(1):7-11.
[33] 李双建, 肖开华, 沃玉进, 等.南方海相上奥陶统—下志留统优质烃源岩发育的控制因素[J].沉积学报, 2008, 26(5):872-880.
LI Shuangjian, XIAO Kaihua, WO Yujin, et al.Developmental controlling factors of Upper Ordovician-Lower Silurian high quality source rocks in marine sequence, South China[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2008, 26(5):872-880.
[34] SWEERE T, VAN DEN BOORN S, DICKSON A J, et al.Definition of new trace-metal proxies for the controls on organic matter enrichment in marine sediments based on Mn, Co, Mo and Cd concentrations[J].Chemical Geology, 2016, 441:235-245.
[35] 昝博文, 刘树根, 冉波, 等.扬子板块北缘下志留统龙马溪组重晶石结核特征及其成因机制分析[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2017, 36(2): 213-226.
ZAN Bowen, LIU Shugen, RAN Bo, et al.An analysis of barite concretions from Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation on the northern margin of the Yangtze block and their genetic mechanism[J].Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2017, 36(2):213-226.
[36] 严德天, 汪建国, 王卓卓, 等.扬子地区上奥陶—下志留统生物钡特征及其古生产力意义[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 24(4):16-19.
YAN Detian, WANG Jianguo, WANG Zhuozhuo, et al.Biogenetic barium distribution from the Upper Ordovician to Lower Silurian in the Yangtze area and its significance to paleoproductivity[J].Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2009, 24(4):16-19.
[37] 朱逸青, 陈更生, 刘勇, 等.四川盆地南部凯迪阶——埃隆阶层序地层与岩相古地理演化特征[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(5):974-985.
ZHU Yiqing, CHEN Gengsheng, LIU Yong, et al.Sequence stratigraphy and lithofacies paleogeographic evolution of Katian stage-Aeronian stage in southern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(5):974-985.
[38] WORNE S, KENDER S, SWANN G E A, et al.Coupled climate and subarctic Pacific nutrient upwelling over the last 850, 000 years[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2019, 522:87-97.
[39] PICHEVIN L E, GANESHRAM R S, GEIBERT W, et al.Silica burial enhanced by iron limitation in oceanic upwelling margins[J].Nature Geoscience, 7:541-546.
[40] NIU Xing, YAN Detian, ZHUANG Xinguo, et al.Origin of quartz in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in south Hubei Province, Upper Yangtze platform[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 96:271-287.
[41] 刘峰, 蔡进功, 吕炳全, 等.下扬子五峰组上升流相烃源岩沉积特征[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(3):440-444.
LIU Feng, CAI Jingong, LV Bingquan, et al.Sedimentary characters of Wufeng Formation upwelling facies source rock in Lower Yangtze area[J].Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2011, 39(3):440-444.
[42] 王淑芳, 邹才能, 董大忠, 等.四川盆地富有机质页岩硅质生物成因及对页岩气开发的意义[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 50(3):476-486.
WANG Shufang, ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, et al.Biogenic silica of organic-rich shale in Sichuan Basin and its significance for shale gas[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2014, 50(3):476-486.
[43] 腾格尔, 刘文汇, 徐永昌, 等.缺氧环境及地球化学判识标志的探讨——以鄂尔多斯盆地为例[J].沉积学报, 2004, 22(2):365-372.
TONGER, LIU Wenhui, XU Yongchang, et al.The discussion on anoxic environments and its geochemical identifying indices[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2004, 22(2):365-372.
[44] 腾格尔, 卢龙飞, 俞凌杰, 等.页岩有机质孔隙形成、保持及其连通性的控制作用[J].石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(4):687-699.
TENGER, LU Longfei, YU Lingjie, et al.Formation, preservation and connectivity control of organic pores in shale[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(4):687-699.
[45] 李登华, 李建忠, 黄金亮, 等.火山灰对页岩油气成藏的重要作用及其启示[J].天然气工业, 2014, 34(5):56-65.
LI Denghua, LI Jianzhong, HUANG Jinliang, et al.An important role of volcanic ash in the formation of shale plays and its inspiration[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(5):56-65.

深层海相页岩气立体开发"甜点"岩相及其成因机制——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例

Sweet spot lithofacies and its genesis mechanism for stereoscopic development of deep marine shale: a case study of the first submember of Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Luzhou area, southern Sichuan Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	江同文, 田威振, 唐青松, 徐伟, 邬光辉. 四川盆地川中地区深层碳酸盐岩走滑断层控藏作用[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1174-1186.
[2]	王茂云, 曾溅辉, 王小娟, 陈冬霞, 吴长江, 潘珂, 张欢乐, 崔虎旺. 源-储分离型致密砂岩气藏中气水分布控制因素——以四川盆地中部地区沙溪庙组致密砂岩气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1187-1201,1218.
[3]	郭彤楼, 熊亮, 杨映涛, 叶素娟. 从储层、烃源岩到输导体勘探——以四川盆地须家河组致密砂岩气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(7): 1078-1091.
[4]	宋金民, 江青春, 刘树根, 金鑫, 范建平, 李智武, 黄士鹏, 苏旺, 杨迪, 姜华, 叶玥豪, 王佳蕊, 王俊轲, 任杉. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段含海泡石层系古环境与沉积格局指示意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 914-931.
[5]	鲁雪松, 桂丽黎, 汪泽成, 柳少波, 刘强, 范俊佳, 陈玮岩, 马行陟, 姜华, 付小东, 李文正, 钟源, 李堃宇, 谢武仁. 四川盆地中部走滑断裂活动时间与控藏作用——来自断裂带胶结物U-Pb定年和流体包裹体的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 642-658.
[6]	杨勇, 张世明, 吕琦, 杜玉山, 李伟忠, 程紫燕, 吕晶, 刘祖鹏. 中国东部陆相断陷盆地中—低成熟度页岩油立体开发技术——以济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 672-682,697.
[7]	梁兴, 单长安, 张磊, 罗瑀峰, 蒋立伟, 张介辉, 朱斗星, 舒红林, 李健. 四川盆地渝西地区大安深层页岩气田的勘探发现及成藏条件[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 477-499.
[8]	惠沙沙, 庞雄奇, 谌卓恒, 王琛茜, 施砍园, 胡涛, 胡耀, 李敏, 梅术星, 黎茂稳. 四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[9]	谭茂金, 武宏亮, 王思宇, 杜广慧, 白洋, 王谦. 中国海相页岩气测井评价技术进展与发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 241-260.
[10]	刘可禹, 刘建良. 盆地沉积充填演化与含油气系统耦合模拟方法在超深层油气成藏模拟中的应用——以四川盆地中部震旦系灯影组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1445-1458.
[11]	武瑾, 李海, 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 郭伟, 孙玉平, 刘永, 刘兆龙. 深层海相页岩纹层类型、组合及其对储层品质的影响——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1517-1531.
[12]	梁峰, 赵群, 石学文, 王玉满, 张琴, 周尚文, 漆麟, 崔会英. 四川盆地龙马溪组地层等时划分新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1274-1298.
[13]	夏钦禹, 马新华, 郭振华, 李文, 江林, 张林, 李新豫, 刘曦翔, 罗瑞兰, 闫海军, 刘钰洋, 阳成. 川中高石梯区块灯影组四段古岩溶带及内部储层分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1299-1312,1332.
[14]	熊亮, 赵勇, 魏力民, 庞河清, 慈建发. 威荣海相页岩气田页岩气富集机理及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1365-1381.
[15]	杨雨, 谢继容, 曹正林, 文龙, 王小娟, 肖尧, 杨建, 唐青松, 唐大海, 李明秋, 关旭, 曾青高, 陈伟华, 陈康, 肖红林. 四川盆地天府气田沙溪庙组大型致密砂岩气藏形成条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 917-932.