石油学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 1432-1442.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202409010

• 石油工程 • 上一篇    

岩石可钻性分级标准的改进建议

石祥超, 陈帅   

  1. 西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室 四川成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-21 修回日期:2024-07-05 发布日期:2024-10-10
  • 作者简介:石祥超,男,1981年7月生,2011年获西南石油大学博士学位,现为西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院教授、博士生导师,主要从事石油工程岩石力学方面的教学与科研工作。Email:sxcdream@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.52474009)和中国石油-西南石油大学创新联合体项目(2020CX040103)资助。

Suggestions for improving the grading standards of rock drillability

Shi Xiangchao, Chen Shuai   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Sichuan Chengdu 610500, China
  • Received:2024-05-21 Revised:2024-07-05 Published:2024-10-10

摘要: 岩石可钻性分级是指导钻井工艺技术优化、提高钻井效率的重要依据,对推动钻井工程技术进步具有重要意义。在过去几十年,岩石可钻性分级标准不断完善,但随着工业的进步和钻井深度的不断增加,岩石可钻性分级标准也逐渐与钻井工业技术的进步不相适应,存在难以区分难钻地层、难以指导钻井工艺技术优化等问题。因此,有必要对可钻性分级方法进行改进以便适应当前和未来技术的发展。通过回顾岩石可钻性分级方法的发展历史及其局限性,开展了大量覆盖三大类岩性的可钻性试验并进行统计分析。分析结果表明,不能依据可钻性测试结果的统计分布情况建立分级标准,两种微钻头测试的结果相关性较差,PDC微钻头可钻性测试结果可重复性较好,作为可钻性测试方法更科学;通过对岩石可钻性计算模型进行讨论,建议未来可钻性的分级标准应将区分硬地层为重要目标进行改进;针对PDC微钻头和牙轮微钻头提出了可钻性指数概念及计算方法;建议将PDC微钻头有效钻进时间0~60 s、60~360 s、360~600 s和大于600 s分别归为"软"、"中下—中—中上"、"硬下—硬—硬上"和"极硬",可钻性指数分别对应0~10、10~60、60~100和大于100;建议将牙轮微钻头有效钻进时间0~40 s、40~280 s、280~400 s和大于400 s分别归为"软"、"中下—中—中上"、"硬下—硬—硬上"和"极硬",可钻性指数分别对应0~10、10~70、70~100和大于100。

关键词: 钻井工程, 岩石, 可钻性, 分级, 可钻性指数, PDC微钻头, 牙轮微钻头

Abstract: The grading of rock drillability can provide an important basis for guiding the optimization of drilling technology and improving drilling efficiency, which is of great significance to promote the progress of the engineering technology of drilling. In the past few decades, the standards for grading rock drillability have been continuously improved. However, with the advancement of industry and the continuous increase of drilling depth, the standards for grading rock drillability have gradually become unapplicable to the increasingly advanced drilling technology; moreover, there are certain difficulties in identifying the strata that are difficult to drill and guiding the optimization of drilling technology. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the drillability grading methods to adapt to the development of current and future technologies. The author reviewed the development history and limitations of the methods for grading rock drillability, conducted a large number of drillability tests covering three types of lithology, and performed statistical analysis. The analysis results indicate that the grading standards can not be established based on the statistical distribution of drillability test results. There is a poor correlation between the test results of the two types of microbits. The drillability test results of PDC microbits has good repeatability, so it is more scientific to use PDC bit for the drillability test method; by exploring the calculation model of rock drillability, it is suggested that in the future, the standards for grading drillability should be improved in terms of identifying hard strata; the concept and calculation methods of drillability index are proposed for PDC microbit and roller microbit; it is recommended to classify the effective drilling time of PDC microbits 0-60 s, 60-360 s, 360-600 s, and >600 s as being "soft", "medium-lower+medium+medium-upper", "hard-lower+hard+hard-upper", and "extremely hard", respectively, corresponding to the drillability indexes of 0-10, 10-60, 60-100, and >100; it is recommended to classify the effective drilling time of roller microbits 0-40 s, 40-280 s, 280-400 s, and >400 s as being "soft", "medium-lower+medium+medium-upper", "hard-lower+hard+hard-upper", and "extremely hard", respectively, corresponding to the drillability indexes of 0-10, 10-70, 70-100, and >100;

Key words: drilling engineering, rock, drillability, grading, drillability index, PDC microbit, roller microbit

中图分类号: