松辽盆地古龙凹陷青山口组页岩的岩浆热液作用证据

doi:10.7623/syxb202410002

石油学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 1462-1479.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202410002

• 地质勘探 • 上一篇

松辽盆地古龙凹陷青山口组页岩的岩浆热液作用证据

何文渊^1,2, 白雪峰², 王瑞², 钟建华^3,4,5, 孙宁亮^3,4,6

1. 中国石油国际勘探开发有限公司北京 100034;
2. 多资源协同陆相页岩油绿色开采全国重点实验室黑龙江大庆 163712;
3. 东北大学秦皇岛分校资源与材料学院河北秦皇岛 066004;
4. 海洋油气勘探国家工程研究中心北京 100028;
5. 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院山东青岛 266580;
6. 东北大学海洋工程研究院河北秦皇岛 066004

收稿日期:2023-12-29 修回日期:2024-07-30 发布日期:2024-11-02
通讯作者: 钟建华,男,1957年2月生,1993年获中国科学院长沙大地构造研究所博士学位,现为东北大学秦皇岛分校兼职教授,主要从事沉积学和构造地质学研究。Email:957576033@qq.com
作者简介:何文渊,男,1974年10月生,2001年获北京大学博士学位,现为中国石油国际勘探开发有限公司总经理、教授级高级工程师,主要从事石油地质与勘探研究。Email:hewy@cnpc.com.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No.42072138,No.41572088)、中国石油天然气股份有限公司科技重大专项“大庆古龙页岩油勘探开发理论与关键技术研究”(2021ZZ10)、黑龙江省“百千万”工程科技重大专项“松辽盆地北部古龙页岩油成藏条件及甜点分布规律研究”(2020ZX05A01)、河北省自然科学基金项目(D2024501002)和中央高校基本科研业务专项资金项目(N2423020)资助。

Evidence of magmatic hydrothermal action in the shale of Q ingshankou Formation of Gulong sag,Songliao Basin

He Wenyuan^1,2, Bai Xuefeng², Wang Rui², Zhong Jianhua^3,4,5, Sun Ningliang^3,4,6

1. China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Company Ltd., Beijing 100034, China;
2. National Key Laboratory for Green Mining of Multi-resource Collaborative Continental Shale Oil, Heilongjiang Daqing 163712, China;
3. School of Resources and Materials, Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao, Hebei Qinhuangdao 066004, China;
4. National Engineering Research Center of Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration, Beijing 100028, China;
5. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Shandong Qingdao 266580, China;
6. Ocean Engineering Research Institute, Northeastern University, Hebei Qinhuangdao 066004, China

Received:2023-12-29 Revised:2024-07-30 Published:2024-11-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解释古龙凹陷青山口组在浅埋深(2 000~2 600 m)条件下轻质油的形成机理,通过背散射图像、能谱、稀土元素、碳-氧同位素和流体包裹体分析,以及岩心和岩石薄片观察,发现了古龙凹陷青山口组页岩油普遍遭受岩浆热液作用的证据,并对其进行了分析。岩浆热液作用的证据主要包括:① 页岩油储层中发现了与岩浆热液作用相关的黄铜矿、自然铜、闪锌矿及二硫化锌矿、辉银矿及硫化银矿、Fe-Cr-Ni-Ti及Ni-Fe-Mo合金、重晶石、氟磷灰石和氧化钛矿物等;② 在样品渗出油中检测到铌、钽、钨和汞等高温岩浆热液元素;③ 在遭受岩浆热液蚀变作用的岩心中,方解石脉中盐水包裹体高温段的均一温度为130.0~166.8 ℃,高于非热液蚀变岩心中方解石脉的正常温度(30~58 ℃);④ 碳-氧同位素及稀土元素分析均反映古龙凹陷青山口组页岩经受了岩浆热液作用;⑤ 在齐家—古龙凹陷北部的金X井和中部的英页Y井,岩心中均发现大量岩浆热液作用证据,包括“玻璃”、球粒、角岩、气孔和杏仁等构造。从区域上讲,古龙凹陷深部存在一个磁性异常、重力异常和电性异常带,地震剖面也揭示古龙凹陷基底存在大面积连片岩浆热液带,其下正好有一个地垒,其两侧的正断层为岩浆热液上侵到青山口组页岩创造了条件。金X井钻遇岩墙状侵入体,岩心内发育强烈的岩浆热液蚀变现象。岩浆热液作用证据的发现对于研究古龙凹陷青山口组页岩的储集空间及页岩油的分布具有重要意义。

关键词: 岩浆热液作用, 热液矿物, 页岩油, 青山口组, 古龙凹陷

Abstract: To explain the formation mechanism of light oil in Qingshankou Formation of Gulong sag under the condition of shallow burial depth (2 000 m to 2 600 m), based on the analyses of back scattered images, energy spectra, rare earth elements, carbon and oxygen isotopes, fluid inclusions, as well as the observation of cores and thin sections, the evidence that the shale oil of Qingshankou Formation in Gulong sag was subjected to magmatic hydrothermal action was found and analyzed. The evidences of magmatic hydrothermal action mainly include as follows. (1) The minerals related to magmatic hydrothermal solution were discovered in shale oil reservoirs, including chalcopyrite, copper, pyrite, sphalerite and zinc disulfide, argentite and silver sulfide, Fe-Cr-Ni-Ti and Ni-Fe-Mo alloys, barite, fluorapatite, and titanium oxide. (2) High temperature magmatic hydrothermal solution elements such as Nb, Ta, W, and Hg were detected in the oil seeped out of the sample. (3) In the core subjected to magmatic hydrothermal alteration, the homogenization temperature for the high temperature section of the saline inclusions of calcite vein ranges from 130.0 ℃ to 166.8 ℃, which is higher than the normal temperature of calcite veins in non-hydrothermal altered cores (30 ℃ to 58 ℃). (4) The analysis results of carbon-oxygen isotopes and rare earth elements reflect that the Qingshankou Formation shale of Gulong sag has undergone magmatic hydrothermal action. (5) A large number of magmatic hydrothermal alteration phenomena were found in the cores of Well Jin X in the north and Well Yingye Y in the middle of Qijia-Gulong sag, including "glass", spherulite, hornfel, pore, almond structures. From a regional perspective, there is a magnetic anomaly, gravity anomaly and electrical anomaly zone in the deep part of Gulong sag. The seismic section reveals that there is a large area of continuous magmatic hydrothermal zone in the basement of Gulong sag, with a horst underneath. The normal faults on both sides of the horst create conditions for magmatic hydrothermal intrusion into the Qingshankou Formation shale. A dike-like intrusion was encountered during drilling the Well Jin X, and strong magmatic hydrothermal alteration was also found in the core samples. The discovery of the evidence of magmatic hydrothermal action is of great significance for studying the shale reservoir spaces and shale oil distribution in Qingshankou Formation of Gulong sag.

Key words: magmatic hydrothermal action, hydrothermal mineral, shale oil, Qingshankou Formation, Gulong sag

中图分类号:

TE121.1

何文渊, 白雪峰, 王瑞, 钟建华, 孙宁亮. 松辽盆地古龙凹陷青山口组页岩的岩浆热液作用证据[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(10): 1462-1479.

He Wenyuan, Bai Xuefeng, Wang Rui, Zhong Jianhua, Sun Ningliang. Evidence of magmatic hydrothermal action in the shale of Q ingshankou Formation of Gulong sag,Songliao Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(10): 1462-1479.

参考文献

[1] 金之钧,朱东亚,胡文瑄,等. 塔里木盆地热液活动地质地球化学特征及其对储层影响[J].地质学报,2006,80(2):245-253.
JIN Zhijun,ZHU Dongya,HU Wenxuan,et al.Geological and geochemical signatures of hydrothermal activity and their influence on carbonate reservoir beds in the Tarim Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2006,80(2):245-253.
[2] 朱东亚,金之钧,胡文瑄.塔中地区热液改造型白云岩储层[J].石油学报,2009,30(5):698-704.
ZHU Dongya,JIN Zhijun,HU Wenxuan.Hydrothermal alteration dolomite reservoir in Tazhong area[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(5):698-704.
[3] 王坤,胡素云,胡再元,等.塔里木盆地古城地区寒武系热液作用及其对储层发育的影响[J].石油学报,2016,37(4):439-453.
WANG Kun,HU Suyun,HU Zaiyuan,et al.Cambrian hydrothermal action in Gucheng area,Tarim Basin and its influences on reservoir development[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(4):439-453.
[4] 陈轩,赵文智,张利萍,等.川中地区中二叠统构造热液白云岩的发现及其勘探意义[J].石油学报,2012,33(4):562-569.
CHEN Xuan,ZHAO Wenzhi,ZHANG Liping,et al.Discovery and exploration significance of structure-controlled hydrothermal dolomites in the Middle Permian of the central Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(4):562-569.
[5] 金小燕,杜晓峰,王清斌,等.渤海海域火山热流体及其对碳酸盐岩优质储层的控制作用[J].石油实验地质,2018,40(6):800-807.
JIN Xiaoyan,DU Xiaofeng,WANG Qingbin,et al.Volcanic hydrothermal fluid activity and its influence on carbonate reservoirs in Bohai Sea area[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2018,40(6):800-807.
[6] 董月霞,周海民,夏文臣.南堡凹陷火山活动与裂陷旋回[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(4):304-307.
DONG Yuexia,ZHOU Haimin,XIA Wenchen.Volcanic activities and rift-subsidence cycles in Nanpu sag[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2000,21(4):304-307.
[7] 王玉萍,董春梅,陈洪德,等.鄂尔多斯盆地中西部奥陶纪热液活动的证据及其对储层发育的影响[J].海相油气地质,2014,19(2): 23-31.
WANG Yuping,DONG Chunmei,CHEN Hongde,et al.Petrological evidence of Ordovician hydrothermal activities and its geological significance to reservoir development in central and western parts of Ordos Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2014,19(2):23-31.
[8] 何文渊,赵莹,钟建华,等.松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组页岩油储层中微米孔缝特征及油气意义[J].岩性油气藏,2024,36(3): 1-18.
HE Wenyuan,ZHAO Ying,ZHONG Jianhua,et al.Characteristics and significance of micron pores and micron fractures in shale oil reservoirs of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong sag,Songliao Basin[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(3):1-18.
[9] 陈昭年,陈发景.松辽盆地反转构造运动学特征[J].现代地质,1996,10(3):390-396.
CHEN Zhaonian,CHEN Fajing.Kinematic characteristics of inversion structures in Songliao Basin[J].Geoscience,1996,10(3):390-396.
[10] 王凤兰,付志国,王建凯,等.松辽盆地古龙页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2021,40(5):144-156.
WANG Fenglan,FU Zhiguo,WANG Jiankai,et al.Characteristics and classification evaluation of Gulong shale oil reservoir in Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2021,40(5):144-156.
[11] 高瑞祺.泥岩异常高压带油气的生成排出特征与泥岩裂缝油气藏的形成[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1984,3(1):160-167.
GAO Ruiqi.Characteristics of petroleum generation and expulsion in abnormal pressure shale zones and the formation of fractured shale reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,1984,3(1):160-167.
[12] 孙龙德,刘合,何文渊,等.大庆古龙页岩油重大科学问题与研究路径探析[J].石油勘探与开发,2021,48(3):453-463.
SUN Longde,LIU He,HE Wenyuan,et al.An analysis of major scientific problems and research paths of Gulong shale oil in Daqing oilfield,NE China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2021,48(3):453-463.
[13] 孙龙德.古龙页岩油(代序)[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2020,39(3):1-7.
SUN Longde.Gulong shale oil (preface)[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2020,39(3):1-7.
[14] 何文渊,蒙启安,冯子辉,等.松辽盆地古龙页岩油原位成藏理论认识及勘探开发实践[J].石油学报,2022,43(1):1-14.
HE Wenyuan,MENG Qi’an,FENG Zihui,et al.In-situ accumulation theory & exploration and development practice of Gulong shale oil in Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(1):1-14.
[15] 何文渊,崔宝文,王凤兰,等.松辽盆地古龙凹陷白垩系青山口组储集空间与油态研究[J].地质论评,2022,68(2):693-741.
HE Wenyuan,CUI Baowen,WANG Fenglan,et al.Study on reservoir spaces and oil states of the Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong sag,Songliao Basin[J].Geological Review,2022,68(2):693-741.
[16] 何文渊,赵莹,钟建华,等.松辽盆地古龙凹陷青山口组页岩油储层中有机质微孔特征[J].地质论评,2023,69(3):1161-1183.
HE Wenyuan,ZHAO Ying,ZHONG Jianhua,et al.Study on organic matter and micropores of Qingshankou Formation shale oil reservoir in Gulong sag,Songliao Basin[J].Geological Review,2023,69(3):1161-1183.
[17] 何文渊,白雪峰,钟建华,等.松辽盆地古龙页岩油储层干酪根的有机元素组成及其N元素的地球化学意义[J].地质学报,2024,98(6):1840-1866.
HE Wenyuan,BAI Xuefeng,ZHONG Jianhua,et al.Organic element compositions and its N geochemical significances of the kerogen of Gulong shale oil reservoir in Songliao Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2024,98(6):1840-1866.
[18] 何文渊,崔宝文,张金友,等.松辽盆地北部嫩江组中-低成熟页岩油地质特征及勘探突破[J].石油学报,2024,45(6):900-913.
HE Wenyuan,CUI Baowen,ZHANG Jinyou,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration breakthroughs of the middle to low mature shale oil of Nenjiang Formation in northern Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(6):900-913.
[19] 张博为,张居和,冯子辉,等.松辽盆地青山口组古龙页岩轻质原油形成地质条件与资源潜力[J].石油学报,2021,42(12):1625-1639.
ZHANG Bowei,ZHANG Juhe,FENG Zihui,et al.Geological conditions and resource potential for the formation of light crude oil from Gulong shale in Qingshankou Formation,Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(12):1625-1639.
[20] DAVIESGR,SMITH JRLB.Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies:an overview[J].AAPG Bulletin,2006,90(11):1641-1690.
[21] 何文渊.松辽盆地古龙页岩油储层黏土中纳米孔和纳米缝的发现及其意义[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2022,41(3):1-13.
HE Wenyuan.Discovery and significance of nano pores and nano fractures of clay in Gulong shale oil reservoir in Songliao Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2022,41(3):1-13.
[22] 何文渊.松辽盆地古龙凹陷页岩油储层中的纳孔纳缝及其原位成藏理论初探[J].地学前缘,2023,30(1):156-173.
HE Wenyuan.Preliminary study on nanopores,nanofissures,and in situ accumulation of Gulong shale oil[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2023,30(1):156-173.
[23] BENNETT R H,BRYANT W R,KELLER G H.Clay fabric and geotechnical properties of selected submarine sediment cores from the Mississippi Delta[R].Mississippi:No.9,U.S.Department of Commerce/NOAA/ERL,1977.
[24] GUY PLINT A.Mud dispersal across a Cretaceous prodelta:storm-generated,wave-enhanced sediment gravity flows inferred from mudstone microtexture and microfacies[J].Sedimentology,2014,61(3):609-647.
[25] FONTANA E,MEXIAS A S,RENAC C,et al.Hydrothermal alteration of volcanic rocks in Seival Mine Cu-mineralization-Camaquã Basin-Brazil (part I):chloritization process and geochemical dispersion in alteration halos[J].Journal of Geochemical Exploration,2017,177:45-60.
[26] BARTON P B,BETHKEP M.Chalcopyrite disease in sphalerite:pathology and epidemiology[J].American Mineralogist,1987,72(5/6): 451-467.
[27] LEPETIT P,BENTE K,DOERING T,et al.Crystal chemistry of Fe-containing sphalerites[J].Physics and Chemistry of Minerals,2003,30(4):185-191.
[28] COOK N J,CIOBANU C L,PRING A,et al.Trace and minor elements in sphalerite:a LA-ICPMS study[J].Geochimicaet Cosmochimica Acta,2009,73(16):4761-4791.
[29] MARTÍN J D,SOLER I GIL A.An integrated thermodynamic mixing model for sphalerite geobarometry from 300 to 850℃ and up to 1 GPa[J].Geochimicaet Cosmochimica Acta,2005,69(4):995-1006.
[30] MAO Zhihao,CHENG Yanbo,LIU Jiajun,et al.Geology and molybdenite Re-Os age of the Dahutang granite-related veinlets-disseminated Tungsten ore field in the Jiangxin Province,China[J].Ore Geology Reviews,2013,53:422-433.
[31] VILA T,SILLITOE R H.Gold-rich porphyry systems in the Maricunga Belt,northern Chile[J].Economic Geology,1991,86(6):1238-1260.
[32] ABIDI R,SLIM-SHIMI N,MARIGNAC C,et al.The origin of sulfate mineralization and the nature of the BaSO₄-SrSO₄ solid-solution series in the Ain Allega and El Aguiba ore deposits,northern Tunisia[J].Ore Geology Reviews,2012,48:165-179.
[33] KUSAKABE M,ROBINSON B W.Oxygen and sulfur isotope equilibria in the BaSO4-HSO4-H2O system from 110 to 350℃ and applications[J].Geochimicaet Cosmochimica Acta,1977,41(8):1033-1040.
[34] LUPULESCU M V,HUGHES J M,CHIARENZELLI J R,et al.Texture,crystal structure,and composition of fluorapatites from iron oxide-apatite (ioa) deposits,eastern Adirondack Mountains,New York[J].The Canadian Mineralogist,2017,55(3):399-417.
[35] APUKHTINA O B,KAMENETSKY V S,EHRIG K,et al.Early,deep magnetite-fluorapatite mineralization at the Olympic dam Cu-U-Au-Ag deposit,South Australia[J].Economic Geology,2017,112(6):1531-1542.
[36] LEROY N,BRES E.Structure and substitutions in fluorapatite[J].European Cells & Materials,2001,2:36-48.
[37] SLACK J F,KELLEY K D,ANDERSON V M,et al.Multistage hydrothermal silicification and Fe-Ti-As-Sb-Ge-REE enrichment in the red dog Zn-Pb-Ag district,northern Alaska:geochemistry,origin,and exploration applications[J].Economic Geology,2004,99(7):1481-1508.
[38] DOBRZHINETSKAYA L,BOZHILOV K N,GREEN II H W.The solubility of TiO2 in olivine:implications for the mantle wedge environment [J].Chemical Geology,2000,163(1/4):325-338.
[39] MILLIKEN K L.The silicified evaporite syndrome-two aspects of silicification history of former evaporite nodules from southern Kentucky and northern Tennessee[J].Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,1979,49(1):245-256.
[40] SUN Ningliang,HE Wenyuan,ZHONG Jianhua et al.Widespread development of bedding-parallel calcite veins in medium-high maturity organic-rich lacustrine shales (Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation,northern Songliao Basin,NE China):implications for hydrocarbon generation and horizontal compression[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2023,158:106544.
[41] 朱国文,王小军,张金友,等.松辽盆地陆相页岩油富集条件及勘探开发有利区[J].石油学报,2023,44(1):110-124.
ZHU Guowen,WANG Xiaojun,ZHANG Jinyou,et al.Enrichment conditions and favorable zones for exploration and development of continental shale oil in Songliao Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(1):110-124.
[42] 曹金华.松辽盆地综合地球物理剖面地质解释[D].长春:吉林大学,2017.
CAO Jinhua.Geological interpretation of integrated geophysical profile in Songliao Basin,NE China[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2017.

松辽盆地古龙凹陷青山口组页岩的岩浆热液作用证据

Evidence of magmatic hydrothermal action in the shale of Q ingshankou Formation of Gulong sag,Songliao Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蒲秀刚, 柴公权, 许静, 时战楠, 韩文中, 官全胜, 刘学伟, 李昊东, 王栋, 董姜畅. 黄骅坳陷古近系细粒沉积区勘探开发认识技术迭代与页岩油增储上产成效[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(9): 1399-1408.
[2]	窦立荣, 温志新, 王兆明, 贺正军, 陈瑞银, 宋成鹏, 刘小兵. 全球古老油气成藏组合资源潜力、重大发现及启示[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1163-1173.
[3]	黄军平, 刘新社, 张艳, 井向辉, 张才利, 李相博. 鄂尔多斯盆地海相页岩油地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1202-1218.
[4]	王飞, 乔润伟, 祝健, 张士诚. 基于焖井压降曲线的页岩油井压裂缝网特征诊断[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(8): 1234-1243,1269.
[5]	何文渊, 崔宝文, 张金友, 赵莹, 程心阳, 刘召, 刘鑫, 曾花森. 松辽盆地北部嫩江组中—低成熟页岩油地质特征及勘探突破[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 900-913.
[6]	刘胜男, 朱如凯, 靳军, 张婧雅. 油气运移约束陆相页岩油富集——以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 932-946.
[7]	王鑫, 蒙启安, 白云风, 张金友, 王民, 刘召, 孙先达, 李进步, 许承武, 徐亮, 邓仔晓, 吴艳, 卢双舫. 页岩储集性与含油性的毫米级精细评价及意义——以松辽盆地青山口组一段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 961-975.
[8]	解德录, 赵贤正, 金凤鸣, 蒲秀刚, 韩文中, 时战楠, 张伟, 董雄英. 沧东凹陷深湖亚相纹层状页岩成因及页岩油可动性影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 804-816.
[9]	熊钰, 郭美娟, 王羚鸿, 吴道铭, 陈美华, 李明秋, 邓波, 张芮, 路俊刚, 曾德铭. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油特征及可动性评价[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(5): 817-843.
[10]	侯连华, 米敬奎, 罗霞, 于志超, 林森虎, 廖凤荣, 庞正炼, 赵忠英. 压力对页岩原位加热产出油气特征的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组7段3亚段页岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 629-641.
[11]	杨勇, 张世明, 吕琦, 杜玉山, 李伟忠, 程紫燕, 吕晶, 刘祖鹏. 中国东部陆相断陷盆地中—低成熟度页岩油立体开发技术——以济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 672-682,697.
[12]	何永宏, 李桢, 樊建明, 张超, 张旭泽, 马兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地页岩油开发井网优化技术及实践——以庆城油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 683-697.
[13]	武晓光, 龙腾达, 黄中伟, 高文龙, 李根生, 谢紫霄, 杨芮, 鲁京松, 马金亮. 页岩油多岩性交互储层径向井穿层压裂裂缝扩展特征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 559-573,585.
[14]	宋兆杰, 邓森, 宋宜磊, 刘勇, 鲜成钢, 张江, 韩啸, 曹胜, 付兰清, 崔焕琦. 大庆油田古龙页岩油-CO₂高压相态及传质规律[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 390-402.
[15]	吴宝成, 吴承美, 谭强, 褚艳杰, 梁成钢, 李文波, 张金风, 陈依伟, 徐田录, 王良哲. 准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷昌吉页岩油成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 437-460.