考虑相间传质的全瞬态井筒气液两相流模型

doi:10.7623/syxb202411009

石油学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 1680-1689.DOI: 10.7623/syxb202411009

• 石油工程 • 上一篇

考虑相间传质的全瞬态井筒气液两相流模型

杨宏伟¹, 李军^1,2, 张辉¹, 张更¹, 邢星³

1. 中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院北京 102249;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)克拉玛依校区石油学院新疆克拉玛依 834000;
3. 中国石油青海油田公司钻采工艺研究院甘肃敦煌 736202

收稿日期:2024-01-01 修回日期:2024-09-07 发布日期:2024-12-03
通讯作者: 李军,男,1971年4月生,2005年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院教授、博士生导师,主要从事钻井新技术、井筒完整性等方面研究。Email:lijun446@vip.163.com
作者简介:杨宏伟,男,1990年2月生,2020年获中国石油大学(北京)博士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)副教授,主要从事控压钻井、智能井控等方面的研究。Email:zerotone@cup.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No.52104012,No.52474018,No.52227804,No.U22B2072)、中国石油大学(北京)科研基金项目(2462023BJRC008)和国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3009200)资助。

Fully transient wellbore gas-liquid two-phase flow model considering interphase mass transfer

Yang Hongwei¹, Li Jun^1,2, Zhang Hui¹, Zhang Geng¹, Xing Xing³

1. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. Petroleum College, China University of Petroleum(Beijing) at Karamay, Xinjiang Karamay 834000, China;
3. Drilling and Production Technology Research Institute, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Gansu Dunhuang 736202, China

Received:2024-01-01 Revised:2024-09-07 Published:2024-12-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于滑移上升气泡的界面传质理论与气液两相流理论,结合井筒流体与地层间的传热机理,建立了油基钻井液条件下考虑相间传质的全瞬态非等温气液两相流模型,利用O’Bryan气侵实验数据对该模型进行了验证。研究结果表明,地层气体与油基钻井液的相间传质速率相对较慢,气体并不会立即完全溶解于未饱和的油基钻井液中,而是伴随着油基钻井液沿井筒向上流动时逐渐溶解。在相同气侵速率条件下,该模型计算的井筒内自由气体积分数大于以往考虑稳态相间传质的气液两相流模型。气液相间传质速率随着气体浓度和流体流速的增加而增大。该模型突破了以往基于稳态相间传质的井筒多相流模型的缺陷,能够更准确地描述油基钻井液中气液两相流动规律。

关键词: 气液两相流, 相间传质, 气泡水力学, 油基钻井液, 气侵

Abstract: Based on the interfacial mass transfer theory of slip-rising bubbles and the gas-liquid two-phase flow theory, in combination with the heat transfer mechanism between wellbore fluid and formation, the paper establishes a fully transient and non-isothermal gas-liquid two-phase flow model considering the interphase mass transfer in oil-based drilling fluid, and the model is verified by O’Bryan’s gas kick experiment data. The research results show that the interphase mass transfer rate between formation gas and oil-based drilling fluid is relatively slow, so that the gas will not be completely dissolved in the unsaturated oil-based drilling fluid immediately, and will be gradually dissolved as the oil-based drilling fluid flows upward along the wellbore. At the same gas kick rate, the volume fraction of the free gas in the wellbore calculated by the above model is slightly larger than that of the previous gas-liquid two-phase flow model considering stable interphase mass transfer. Moreover, the gas-fluid interphase mass transfer rate is increased with the increasing of gas concentration and fluid flow rate. In addition, this model breaks the shortcomings of the previous wellbore multiphase flow model based on stable interphase mass transfer, which can more accurately describe the law of gas-fluid phase flow in oil-based drilling fluid.

Key words: gas-liquid phase flow, interphase mass transfer, bubble hydraulics, oil-based drilling fluid, gas kick

中图分类号:

TE258

杨宏伟, 李军, 张辉, 张更, 邢星. 考虑相间传质的全瞬态井筒气液两相流模型[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(11): 1680-1689.

Yang Hongwei, Li Jun, Zhang Hui, Zhang Geng, Xing Xing. Fully transient wellbore gas-liquid two-phase flow model considering interphase mass transfer[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(11): 1680-1689.

参考文献

[1] 刘书杰,谢仁军,仝刚,等. 中国海洋石油集团有限公司深水钻完井技术进展及展望[J].石油学报,2019,40(S2):168-173.
LIU Shujie,XIE Renjun,TONG Gang,et al.Progress and prospect of deepwater well drilling and completion technique of CNOOC[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(S2):168-173.
[2] 杨进,傅超,刘书杰,等.超深水浅层建井关键技术创新与实践[J].石油学报,2022,43(10):1500-1508.
YANG Jin,FU Chao,LIU Shujie,et al.Key technological innovation and practice of well construction in ultra-deepwater shallow Formations [J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(10):1500-1508.
[3] 李中.中国海油深水钻井技术进展及发展展望[J].中国海上油气,2021,33(3):114-120.
LI Zhong.Progress and prospect of deepwater drilling technology in CNOOC[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2021,33(3):114-120.
[4] 杨进,李磊,宋宇,等.中国海洋油气钻井技术发展现状及展望[J].石油学报,2023,44(12):2308-2318.
YANG Jin,LI Lei,SONG Yu,et al.Current status and prospects of offshore oil and gas drilling technology development in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(12):2308-2318.
[5] DE SOUSA P F B,BORGES V L,PEREIRA I C,et al.Estimation of heat flux and temperature field during drilling process using dynamic observers based on green's function[J].Applied Thermal Engineering,2012,48:144-154.
[6] 陈阳.深水钻井气侵期间井筒多相流流动规律研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2016.
CHEN Yang.Study on wellbore multiphase flow law during gas kick in deep water drilling[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2016.
[7] RIBEIRO P R,PESSÔA-FILHO P A,LOMBA R F T,et al.Measurement and modeling of methane dissolution in synthetic liquids applied to drilling fluid formulation for deep and ultradeep water wells[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2006,51(1/2):37-44.
[8] O’BRIEN T B.Pormulation and use of sea-water muds,drilling and production practice[D].New York:American Petroleum Institute,1955.
[9] THOMAS D C,LEA JR J F,TUREK E A.Gas solubility in oil-based drilling fluids:effects on kick detection[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1984,36(6):959-968.
[10] ROMMETVEIT R,BLYBERG A,OLSEN L.The effects of operating conditions,reservoir characteristics and control methods on gas kicks in oil based drilling muds[R].SPE 19246-MS,1989.
[11] WHITE D B,WALTON I C.A computer model for kicks in water-and oil-based muds[R].SPE 19975-MS,1990.
[12] VAN SLYKE D C,HUANG E T S.Predicting gas kick behavior in oil-based drilling fluids using a pc-based dynamic wellbore model[R].SPE 19972-MS,1990.
[13] YIN Bangtang,LIU Gang,LI Xiangfang.Multiphase transient flow model in wellbore annuli during gas kick in deepwater drilling based on oil-based mud[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling,2017,51:159-198.
[14] XU Zhengming,SONG Xianzhi,LI Gensheng,et al.Gas kick simulation in oil-based drilling fluids with the gas solubility effect during high-temperature and high-pressure well drilling[J].Applied Thermal Engineering,2019,149:1080-1097.
[15] 李轶明,何敏侠,夏威,等.水平井油基钻井液气侵溶解气膨胀运移规律研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(10):44-49.
LI Yiming,HE Minxia,XIA Wei,et al.Study on swelling and migration laws of dissolved gas during gas kick of oil-based drilling fluid in horizontal well[J].Journal of safety science and technology,2016,12(10):44-49.
[16] 付建红.深水钻井溢流监测与井控技术研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2016.
FU Jianhong.Kick detection and well control technology during deepwater drilling[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2016.
[17] 付建红,冯剑,陈平,等.深水动态压井钻井井筒压力模拟[J].石油学报,2015,36(2):232-237.
FU Jianhong,FENG Jian,CHEN Ping,et al.Simulation on wellbore pressure during dynamic kill drilling in deep water[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(2):232-237.
[18] 李根生,窦亮彬,田守嶒,等.酸性气体侵入井筒瞬态流动规律研究[J].石油钻探技术,2013,41(4):8-14.
LI Gensheng,DOU Liangbin,TIAN Shouceng,et al.Characteristics of wellbore transient flow during sour gas influx[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2013,41(4):8-14.
[19] 孙宝江,王志远,公培斌,等.深水井控的七组分多相流动模型[J].石油学报,2011,32(6):1042-1049.
SUN Baojiang,WANG Zhiyuan,GONG Peibin,et al.Application of a seven-component multiphase flow model to deepwater well control[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(6):1042-1049.
[20] CLIFT R,GRACE J R,WEBER M E.Bubbles,drops and particles[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2006.
[21] NVLLIG M,PETERS F.Experiments on the mass transfer of gas bubbles in mineral oil[J].Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects,2018,540:81-89.
[22] SUN Xiaohui,SUN Baojiang,WANG Zhiyuan,et al.A hydrate shell growth model in bubble flow of water-dominated system considering intrinsic kinetics,mass and heat transfer mechanisms[J].International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2018,117:940-950.
[23] BARNEA D.A unified model for predicting flow-pattern transitions for the whole range of pipe inclinations[J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow,1987,13(1):1-12.
[24] 张宇豪,王志彬,蒋琪,等.基于漂移理论的泡沫排水采气井井筒压降预测模型[J].石油学报,2023,44(5):862-872.
ZHANG Yuhao,WANG Zhibin,JIANG Qi,et al.Prediction model of wellbore pressure drop in foam drainage gas recovery well based on drift theory[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(5):862-872.
[25] KELBALIEV G I.Mass transfer between a drop or gas bubble and an isotropic turbulent flow[J].Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering,2012,46(5):477-485.
[26] 徐宝昌,尤香凝,孟卓然,等.基于回压激励响应的实时地层压力反演方法[J].石油学报,2024,45(6):1009-1018.
XU Baochang,YOU Xiangning,MENG Zhuoran,et al.Real-time Formation pressure inversion method based on back-pressure excitation response[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2024,45(6):1009-1018.
[27] SUN Xiaohui,SUN Baojiang,GAO Yonghai,et al.A model of multiphase flow dynamics considering the hydrated bubble behaviors and its application to deepwater kick simulation[J].Journal of Energy Resources Technology,2018,140(8):082004.
[28] ZHANG Chao,YUAN Xigang,LUO Yiqing,et al.Prediction of species concentration distribution using a rigorous turbulent mass diffusivity model for bubble column reactor simulation part II:analogy between turbulent mass and momentum transfer in toluene emissions biodegradation process[J].Chemical Engineering Science,2018,189:360-368.
[29] YANG Hongwei,LI Jun,LIU Gonghui,et al.Numerical analysis of transient wellbore thermal behavior in dynamic deepwater multi-gradient drilling[J].Energy,2019,179:138-153.
[30] YANG Hongwei,LI Jun,LIU Gonghui,et al.Development of transient heat transfer model for controlled gradient drilling[J].Applied Thermal Engineering,2019,148:331-339.
[31] KHAN N U,MAY R.A Generalized mathematical model to predict transient bottomhole temperature during drilling operation[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2016,147:435-450.
[32] JARRAHIAN A,KARAMI H R,HEIDARYAN E.On the isobaric specific heat capacity of natural gas[J].Fluid Phase Equilibria,2014,384:16-24.
[33] HE Miao,XU Mingbiao,LI Jun,et al.A new two-phase model to simulate sour gas kicks in MPD operations with water based mud[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017,159:331-343.
[34] O'BRYAN P L.Well control problems associated with gas solubility in oil-based drilling fluids[D].Baton Rouge:Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical Collgeg,1988.

考虑相间传质的全瞬态井筒气液两相流模型

Fully transient wellbore gas-liquid two-phase flow model considering interphase mass transfer

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐宝昌, 尤香凝, 孟卓然, 刘伟, 尹士轩. 基于回压激励响应的实时地层压力反演方法[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 1009-1018.
[2]	任妍君, 翟玉芬, 路岩岩. 抗高温高密度可逆油基钻井液体系[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(5): 841-851,861.
[3]	刘争, 孙宝江, 王志远, 陈龙桥, 王鄂川, 陈立涛, 王金堂. 海域天然气水合物降压开采压力控制及气液流动特性[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1173-1184.
[4]	吴涛, 王彬, 费李莹, 刘超威, 任海姣, 李啸, 张越迁, 杨海波. 准噶尔盆地凝析气藏成因与分布规律[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(12): 1640-1653.
[5]	吴俊晨, 范宜仁, 曹军涛, 范卓颖, 王小龙, 吴飞. 基于大尺寸地层模型的砂岩储层油基钻井液侵入模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(11): 1407-1414.
[6]	徐宝昌, 周家立, 刘伟, 付加胜. 基于数据驱动的钻井过程气侵工况预测方法[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1263-1269.
[7]	胡伟, 吕成远, 王锐, 崔茂蕾, 杨阳, 王欣. 水驱转CO₂混相驱渗流机理及传质特征[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(2): 201-207.
[8]	霍锦华, 张瑞, 杨磊. CTAB诱导膨润土乳液转相机理及其在可逆乳化油基钻井液中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(1): 122-128.
[9]	王宁, 孙宝江, 刘书杰, 王志远, 高永海. 井筒内气体扩散侵入定量计算模型[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 1082-1090.
[10]	徐朝阳, 孟英峰, 魏纳, 李皋, 杨谋, 刘佳洁. 气侵过程井筒压力演变规律实验和模型[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(1): 120-126.
[11]	张兴全, 周英操, 刘伟, 郭庆丰, 崔堂波. 碳酸盐岩地层重力置换气侵特征[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(5): 958-962.
[12]	陈平, 马天寿. 深水钻井溢流早期监测技术研究现状[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(3): 602-612.
[13]	谢增业, 魏国齐, 李剑, 杨威, 张光武, 国建英, 张莉. 中国海相碳酸盐岩大气田成藏特征与模式[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(增刊一): 29-40.
[14]	卓鲁斌葛云华张富成汪海阁袁智龙　平 . 碳酸盐岩油气藏气侵早期识别技术[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(S2): 174-180.
[15]	雷登生杜志敏单高军汤勇李涧松付玉. 气藏水平井携液临界流量计算[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(4): 637-639.