基于漏失机理的碳酸盐岩地层漏失压力模型

doi:10.7623/syxb201105026

石油学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 900-904.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201105026

基于漏失机理的碳酸盐岩地层漏失压力模型

李大奇 1 康毅力 1 刘修善 2 曾义金 2 杜春朝 3

1西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室四川成都 610500； 2中国石化石油工程技术研究院北京 100101；3中国石化西北油田分公司新疆乌鲁木齐 830013

收稿日期:2010-11-10 修回日期:2011-04-21 出版日期:2011-09-25 发布日期:2011-11-28
通讯作者: 李大奇
作者简介:李大奇，男，1982年9月生，2009年获西南石油大学油气井工程硕士学位，现为西南石油大学在读博士研究生，主要从事储层保护理论与技术、井壁稳定及防漏堵漏研究。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划（973）项目(2010CB226705)和国家科技重大专项（2008ZX05049-003-07HZ和2008ZX05005-006-08HZ）联合资助。

The lost circulation pressure of carbonate formations on the basis of leakage mechanisms

LI Daqi 1 KANG Yili 1 LIU Xiushan 2 ZENG Yijin 2 DU Chunchao 3

Received:2010-11-10 Revised:2011-04-21 Online:2011-09-25 Published:2011-11-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

漏失压力预测是防漏堵漏的关键。在孔隙型或含微裂缝的砂、泥岩地层中，依据破裂压力设计钻井液安全密度上限值是比较合理的，然而在缝洞发育的碳酸盐岩地层中，往往使得钻井液设计密度值偏大。为了保障安全顺利钻井，亟需建立碳酸盐岩地层的漏失压力预测理论。基于对碳酸盐岩地层钻井液漏失机理的新认识，建立了压裂性漏失、裂缝扩展性漏失、大型裂缝溶洞性漏失的漏失压力模型。压裂性漏失主要抵抗地应力，漏失压力近似等于地层破裂压力；裂缝扩展性漏失需要抵抗地应力和地层压力，漏失压力一般小于地层破裂压力；大型裂缝溶洞性漏失只需抵抗地层压力，漏失压力一般略大于地层压力。实例分析表明，漏失压力模型科学依据更加充分，也更具针对性，预测结果与实际情况比较吻合，为合理的钻井液密度设计及防漏堵漏提供了依据。因此，建议将漏失压力纳入到钻井工程设计中。

关键词: 破裂压力, 防漏堵漏, 安全密度窗口, 储层损害, 碳酸盐岩

Abstract:

The prediction of lost circulation pressure is a key to leak resistance and sealing. It is reasonable for sandstone or mudstone formations with small pores or microcracks to design the upper safe density limit of drilling fluids based on fracture pressure，which, however, often results in a higher safe density value of drilling fluids for carbonate formations with developed fractures or caverns. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a theoretic foundation for the prediction of lost circulation pressure in order to guarantee safe drilling in carbonate formations. Based on the newly obtained cognition on lost circulation mechanisms of drilling liquids in carbonate formations, we established a lost circulation pressure model suitable to different leakage in carbonate formations, such as fracturing leakage，fracture expansion leakage and large-scale fracture or cavern leakage. The fracturing leakage deals mainly with in-situ stress for its lost circulation pressure is approximately equal to the fracture pressure of formations, the fracture expansion leakage is related with both in-situ stress and the formation pressure because the lost circulation pressure is commonly smaller than the fracture pressure of formations, while the large-scale fracture or cavern leakage is merely involved in the formation pressure for the lost circulation pressure is often slightly higher than the formation pressure. Case analyses have proved that this lost circulation pressure model is of sufficiency in scientific bases and pertinence. The prediction result derived from the model is relatively consistent with the actual situation and consequently provides a substantial basis for a rational design of the drilling fluid density as well as the leak resistance and sealing. Therefore, it is suggested that the design of drilling engineering should take the lost circulation pressure into consideration.

Key words: fracture pressure, leak resistance and sealing, safe density window, reservoir damage, carbonate

李大奇康毅力刘修善曾义金杜春朝. 基于漏失机理的碳酸盐岩地层漏失压力模型[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(5): 900-904.

LI Daqi KANG Yili LIU Xiushan ZENG Yijin DU Chunchao. The lost circulation pressure of carbonate formations on the basis of leakage mechanisms[J]. Editorial office of ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2011, 32(5): 900-904.

参考文献

[1]王业众，康毅力，游利军，等．裂缝性储层漏失机理及控制技术研究进展[J]．钻井液与完井液，2007，24（4）：74-77．

Wang Yezhong,Kang Yili,You Lijun,et al.Progresses in mechanism study and control:Mud losses to fractured reservoirs[J].Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid,2007,24(4):74-77.

[2]蔡利山，苏长明，刘金华．易漏失地层承压能力分析[J]．石油学报，2010，31（2）：311-317．

Cai Lishan,Su Changming,Liu Jinhua.Analysis on pressure-bearing capacity of leakage formation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(2):311-317.

[3]Catalin I,James B,Ben B.Lost circulation can be managed better than ever[J].World Oil,2003,224(6):35-41.

[4]徐同台，刘玉杰，申威，等．钻井工程防漏堵漏技术[M]．北京：石油工业出版社，19971-4．

Xu Tongtai,Liu Yujie,Shen Wei,et al.Technology of lost circulation prevention and control during drilling engineering[M].Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,1997:1-4.

[5]鄢捷年．钻井液工艺学[M]．东营：石油大学出版社，2001：350-351．

Yan Jienian.Drilling fluid technology[M].Dongying:The Press of the University of Petroleum,China,2001:350-351.

[6]胥永杰．高陡复杂构造地应力提取方法与井漏机理研究[D]．成都：西南石油学院，2005．

Xu Yongjie.Study on the formation stress calculation method and well leak mechanism of aloft-steep and complex structure[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum Institute,2005.

[7]金衍，陈勉，刘晓明，等．塔中奥陶系碳酸盐岩地层漏失压力统计分析[J]．石油钻采工艺，2007，29（5）：82-84．

Jin Yan,Chen Mian,Liu Xiaoming,et al.Statistic analysis of leakage pressure of ordovician carbonate formation in middle Tarim Basin[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2007,29(5):82-84.

[8]石晓兵，熊继有，陈平，等．高陡复杂构造裂缝漏失堵漏机理研究[J]．钻采工艺，2007，30（5）：24-26．

Shi Xiaobing,Xiong Jiyou,Chen Ping,et al.Study on the lost circulation and sealing mechanism in complex high dip chack formation[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2007,30(5):24-26.

[9]Morita N,Black A D,Fuh G F.Theory of lost circulation pressure[R].SPE 20409,1990.

[10]朱亮，张春阳，楼一珊，等．两种漏失压力计算模型的比较分析[J]．天然气工业，2008，28（12）：60-61，67．

Zhu Liang,Zhang Chunyang,Lou Yishan,et al.Comparative analysis between the mechanics-based and statistics-bused calculation models for leakage pressure[J].Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(12):60-61,67.

[11]李传亮，孔祥言．油井压裂过程中岩石破裂压力计算公式的理论研究[J]．石油钻采工艺，2000，22（2）：54-56．

Li Chuanliang,Kong Xiangyan.A theoretical study on rock breakdown pressure calculation equations of fracturing process[J].Oil Drilling & Production Technology,2000,22(2):54-56.

[12]金衍，张旭东，陈勉．天然裂缝地层中垂直井水力裂缝起裂压力模型研究[J]．石油学报，2005，26（6）:113-114,118．

Jin Yan,Zhang Xudong,Chen Mian.Initiation pressure models for hydraulic fracturing of vertical wells in naturally fractured formation[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(6):113-114,118.

[13]邓金根，刘杨，蔚宝华，等．高温高压地层破裂压力预测方法[J]．石油钻采工艺，2009,37（5）：43-46.

Deng Jingen,Liu Yang,Wei Baohua,et al.Formation fracture pressure prediction method in high temperature and high pressure formations[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2009,37(5):43-46.

[14]郑有成．川东北部飞仙关组探井地层压力测井预测方法与工程应用研究[D]．成都：西南石油学院，2004．

Zheng Youcheng.Prediction method and engineering application research on logging formation pressure in Feixianguan formation exploration well of northeast Sichuan[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum Institute,2004.

[15]Aadnoy B S,Belayneh M,Arriado M,et al.Design of well barriers to combat circulation losses[R].SPE 105449,2007.

[16]Lorenz J C.Stress-sensitive reservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1999,51(1):61-63.

[17]闫丰明，康毅力，李松，等．裂缝—孔洞型碳酸盐岩储层应力敏感性实验研究[J]．天然气地球科学，2010，21（3）：489-493.

Yan Fengming,Kang Yili,Li Song,et al.Simulated experiment on stress sensitivity in fractured-vuggy reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(3):489-493.

基于漏失机理的碳酸盐岩地层漏失压力模型

The lost circulation pressure of carbonate formations on the basis of leakage mechanisms

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄亚浩, 汪如军, 文志刚, 张银涛, 崔仕提, 李梦勤, 王彭, 何涛华. 塔里木盆地富满油田深层—超深层油气成藏过程[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 947-960.
[2]	何文渊, 黄先雄, 王红平, 汪望泉, 范国章, 丁梁波, 赵俊峰, 朱晓辉, 张勇刚, 庞旭, 李伟强, 左国平, 杨柳, 王朝锋. 南美桑托斯盆地深水区古拉绍-1井油气勘探发现及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 339-347.
[3]	陈利新, 贾承造, 姜振学, 苏洲, 杨美纯, 杨博, 邱晨. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区碳酸盐岩富油模式与主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 948-961.
[4]	魏国齐, 贾承造, 杨威. 安岳—奉节地区上震旦统—下寒武统陆架镶边台地地质特征及其对大气田(区)形成的控制作用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 223-240.
[5]	余义常, 郭睿, 林敏捷, 沈毅, 沈博珩, 朱光亚, 李峰峰, 王一帆, 颜元. 中东地区碳酸盐岩储层孔喉结构特征及开发对策 ——以伊拉克X油田M组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(2): 369-384.
[6]	熊连桥, 谢晓军, 邓有根, 唐武, 张春宇, 白海强, 刘子玉, 廖计华. 坎波斯盆地南部下白垩统硅化碳酸盐岩储层成因及演化[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(10): 1612-1623,1649.
[7]	何东博, 闫海军, 杨长城, 位云生, 张连进, 郭建林, 罗文军, 刘曦翔, 胡碟, 夏钦禹, 朱汉卿, 张岩. 安岳气田灯影组四段气藏特征及开发技术对策[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 977-988.
[8]	邱正松, 高健, 赵欣, 耿麒, 刘书杰, 孙昊, 邢希金. 深水疏松砂岩储层微粒运移损害的控制方法[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(7): 1016-1025.
[9]	侯冰, 戴一凡, 范濛, 张鲲鹏, Wick Thomas, Lee Sanghyun. 基于相场法的酸压裂缝连通孔洞数值模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 849-859.
[10]	黄渊, 段太忠, 樊太亮, 刘彦锋, 沈禄银, 张文彪, 李蒙, 张德民. 塔河地区寒武纪碳酸盐岩台地沉积演化史与成因机制——来自地层沉积正演模拟的启示[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(5): 617-636.
[11]	路保平, 王志战, 张元春. 碳酸盐岩孔隙压力预监测理论与方法进展[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(4): 571-580.
[12]	孙亮, 李勇, 李保柱. 中东地区碳酸盐岩油藏分类评价方法与注水开发对策[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(2): 270-280.
[13]	朱超, 刘占国, 宋光永, 龙国徽, 宫清顺, 赵健, 李森明, 夏志远, 吴颜雄, 田明智. 柴达木盆地英雄岭构造带古近系湖相碳酸盐岩沉积模式、演化与分布[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1558-1567,1622.
[14]	孙金声, 刘凡, 程荣超, 冯杰, 郝惠军, 王韧, 白英睿, 刘钦政. 机器学习在防漏堵漏中研究进展与展望[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(1): 91-100.
[15]	魏柳斌, 包洪平, 严婷, 郭玮, 周黎霞, 井向辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部奥陶系马家沟组五段5亚段微生物碳酸盐岩发育特征及储集意义[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(8): 1015-1025.