浮式生产系统泄漏天然气爆燃特性与安全区域

doi:10.7623/syxb201404023

石油学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 786-794.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201404023

浮式生产系统泄漏天然气爆燃特性与安全区域

魏超南, 陈国明, 刘康

中国石油大学海洋油气装备与安全技术研究中心山东青岛 266580

收稿日期:2014-01-26 修回日期:2014-04-22 出版日期:2014-07-25 发布日期:2014-08-05
通讯作者: 陈国明，男，1962年10月生，1982年获华东石油学院学士学位，1999年获石油大学机械工程专业博士学位，现为中国石油大学（华东）海洋油气装备与安全技术研究中心教授、博士生导师，主要从事海洋油气工程及装备、油气安全工程方面的研究。Email：offshore@126.com
作者简介:魏超南，男，1988年2月生，2010年获湖南科技大学学士学位，2013年获中国石油大学（华东）硕士学位，现为中海油安全技术服务有限公司评估评价工程师，主要从事海洋油气安全技术与风险评估方面的研究。Email：wei_chaonan@163.com
基金资助:
国家安全生产监督管理总局2012年安全科技“四个一批”项目（2012-507）和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目（09CX05008A）资助。

Leakage gas deflagration characteristics and safety area of FPSO

Wei Chaonan, Chen Guoming, Liu Kang

Center for Offshore Engineering and Safety Technology, China University of Petroleum, Shandong Qingdao 266580, China

Received:2014-01-26 Revised:2014-04-22 Online:2014-07-25 Published:2014-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对浮式生产系统（FPSO）生产运行过程中潜在的油气泄漏及火灾、爆炸等连锁风险，基于CFD方法建立油气处理系统泄漏天然气爆燃事故后果预测与评估模型，对特定事故场景条件下的天然气爆燃特性进行模拟和分析，研究爆炸超压、火焰温度及热辐射的发展规律，确定各危害指标影响区域及人员安全区域。研究表明，爆燃超压总变化趋势为一次超压阶段→负压阶段→二次超压阶段→基本稳定；原油热处理器泄漏端区域受超压影响最严重，最高达到12.5 kPa；爆燃超压对人体伤害的最小安全半径为R=16.3 m；30 s后天然气爆燃发展成为稳定的池火燃烧状态；火焰温度和热辐射的主要影响区域均集中在原油热处理器下部壁面、其对应的生产甲板以及电脱盐器、电脱水器喂给泵、海水冷却器等邻近设备表面，持续作用下将对船体和设备结构造成严重损坏；火焰温度和热辐射对人体伤害的最小安全半径分别为R=32.8 m和R=57.1 m，结合研究结果从工程应用角度提出适当建议。

关键词: 浮式生产系统, 天然气, 爆燃, 安全区域, 计算流体动力学

Abstract:

Floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) operation has potential risks of chain accidents such as fire and explosion caused by oil and gas leakage. This study develops a computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based model for predicting and evaluating the outcome of deflagration accident caused by gas leakage in crude oil treatment system of FPSO. The CFD model is then used for simulation of gas deflagration characteristics and the results are analyzed to identify the development law of overpressure, flame temperature, and thermal radiation in specific accident scenarios, as well as to determine the impact zone of various indicators and personnel safety zone. In the time course, overpressure generally varies in the following phases:first overpressure → negative pressure → second overpressure → stable state. The area near the leakage point of crude oil thermal theater is affected by overpressure most severely, where the highest overpressure is up to 12.5 kPa. The minimal safety radius for avoiding human body hurt by overpressure is 16.3 m. It takes 30 s for gas deflagration to develop into pool fire in a steady state. The main impact zones of flame temperature and thermal radiation are located at the bottom wall of crude oil thermal theater, the corresponding process deck, and the nearby equipment including electric desalter, electric dehydrator feed pumps, and sea water cooler. Continuous action of such loads will substantially damage the ship body and associated equipment. The minimal safety radius for avoiding human body hurt by flame temperature and thermal radiation are 32.8 and 57.1 m, respectively. Finally, recommendations for improving engineering applications of FPSO are given.

Key words: FPSO, natural gas, deflagration, safety area, CFD

中图分类号:

TE88

魏超南, 陈国明, 刘康. 浮式生产系统泄漏天然气爆燃特性与安全区域[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(4): 786-794.

Wei Chaonan, Chen Guoming, Liu Kang. Leakage gas deflagration characteristics and safety area of FPSO[J]. ACTA PETROLEI SINICA, 2014, 35(4): 786-794.

参考文献

[1] Paik J K,Czujko J,Kim B J,et al.Quantitative assessment of hydrocarbon explosion and fire risks in offshore installations[J].Marine Structures,2011,24(2):73-96.
[2] Muncer M.Analysis of accident statistics for floating monohull and fixed installations[R].Research Report 047,Health and Safety Executive,Aberdeen,UK(2003).
[3] Paik J K,Czujko J.Assessment of hydrocarbon explosion and fire risks in offshore installations:recent advances and future trends[C].Proceedings of the ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean,Offshore and Arctic Engineering.Rotterdam,the Netherlands,2011.
[4] Suardin J A,McPhate Jr.A J,Sipkema A,et al.Fire and explosion assessment on oil and gas floating production storage offloading(FPSO):An effective screening and comparison tool[J].Process Safety and Environmental Protection,2009,87(3): 147-160.
[5] Yoon J Y,Kim S H,Yu G C,et al.Effects of wind on the heat flow of FPSO topsides subject to fire:an experimental and numerical study[C].Proceedings of the ASME 2010 29th International Conference on Ocean,Offshore and Arictic Engineering,OMAE2010.Shanghai,China,2010.
[6] Paik J K,Kim B J,Jeong J S,et al.CFD simulations of gas explosion and fire actions[J].Ships and Offshore Structures,2010,5(1):3-12.
[7] Kim B J,Seo J K,Park J H,et al.Load characteristics of steel and concrete tubular members under jet fire:An experimental and numerical study[J].Ocean Engineering,2010,37(13):1159-1168.
[8] Tam V H Y,Lee R.Gas explosion modelling of FPSO[J].Journal of Loss Prevention Industries,1998,11(1):67-73.
[9] Dera Rosyth.Explosion resistance of floating offshore installations[R].Offshore Technology Report OTO 1999 093,Health and Safety Executive,2000.
[10] Great Britain.Health and Safety Executive.Explosion loading on topsides equipment part 2-determination of explosion loading on offshore equipment using FLACS[R].London:Great Britain.Health and Safety Executive,2000.
[11] Tauseef S M,Rashtchian D,Abbasi S A.CFD-based simulation of dense gas dispersion in presence of obstacles[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2011,24(4):371-376.
[12] Fluent Incorporated.Fluent 12.1 user's guide[M].Cavendish:Fluent Incorporated,2012.
[13] Magnussen B F,Hjertager B H.On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion[J]. Symposium (International)on Combustion,1977,16(1):719-729.
[14] 邓海发,陈国明,朱渊,等.海洋钻井平台井喷硫化氢扩散规律研究[J].安全与环境学报,2010,10(5):177-180.
Deng Haifa,Chen Guoming,Zhu Yuan,et al.Study on H2S dispersion from well blowout in offshore drilling platform[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2010,10(5):177-180.
[15] API.Fitness for service[S].Washington:American Petroleum Institute,2000.
[16] 刘茂.事故风险分析理论与方法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012.
Liu Mao.Accident risk analysis theory and methodology[M].Beijing:Peking University Press,2012.
[17] 毕明树,王淑兰,丁信伟.无约束气云爆燃压力场的计算[J].爆炸与冲击,2002,22(2):148-151.
Bi Mingshu,Wang Shulan,Ding Xinwei.A calculations of deflagration pressure field of unrestricted flammable gas cloud[J].Explosion and Shock Waves,2002,22(2):148-151.
[18] 丁信伟,李志义,李应博.可燃气体云爆燃实验[J].化工学报, 1999,50(4):558-562.
Ding Xinwei,Li Zhiyi,Li Yingbo.Experimental investigation into deflagrations of combusttial vapor clouds[J].Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering,1999,50(4):558-562.
[19] 赵金城,沈为平.高温下钢框架结构非线性有限元分析[J].上海交通大学学报,1996,30(8):55-59.
Zhao Jincheng,Shen Weiping.Non-linear F.E.analysis of steel frames at elevated temperatures[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University,1996,30(8):55-59.
[20] 谢飞,宋文华,陈阵,等.池火灾模型在二氯丙烷存储罐区火灾风险评估中的应用[J].南开大学学报:自然科学版,2012,45(3):100-106.
Xie Fei,Song Wenhua,Chen Zhen,et al.Study on pool fire model applied to the fire risk assessment of dichloropropane storage tank farm[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Nankaiensis,2012,45(3):100-106.

浮式生产系统泄漏天然气爆燃特性与安全区域

Leakage gas deflagration characteristics and safety area of FPSO

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	骆汀汀, 张宸毅, 杨维好, 孙翔, 宋永臣. 含天然气水合物饱和粉质沉积物三轴剪切试验[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 1019-1030.
[2]	刘永革, 李果, 贾伟, 白雅洁, 侯健, Clarke M A, 徐鸿志, 赵二猛, 纪云开, 陈立涛, 郭天魁, 贺甲元, 张乐. 储层改造对Ⅰ类天然气水合物藏降压开发效果的影响规律[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 412-426,460.
[3]	席胜利, 闫伟, 刘新社, 张才利, 殷亮亮, 董国栋, 井向辉, 魏柳斌. 鄂尔多斯盆地天然气勘探新领域、新类型及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 33-51,132.
[4]	牛小兵, 赵伟波, 史云鹤, 胡新友, 杜小伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地本溪组天然气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1240-1257.
[5]	邓运华, 杨永才, 杨婷. 世界油气形成的三个体系[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(6): 873-901.
[6]	魏纳, 裴俊, 蔡萌, 李海涛, 赵金洲, 张烈辉, 薛瑾. 天然气水合物自生热解堵剂热量平衡模拟计算[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(4): 657-671.
[7]	赵二猛, 侯健, 刘永革, 白雅洁. 海水对流增强天然气水合物藏低频电场加热效率模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(4): 672-683.
[8]	刘争, 孙宝江, 王志远, 陈龙桥, 王鄂川, 陈立涛, 王金堂. 海域天然气水合物降压开采压力控制及气液流动特性[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1173-1184.
[9]	田华, 鲁雪松, 张水昌, 柳少波, 田兴旺, 马行陟, 刘强. 四川盆地安岳气田龙王庙组气藏多层盖层天然气扩散量[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(3): 355-363,398.
[10]	吴小力, 徐旺林, 李荣西, 李宁熙, 刘齐, 赵迪, 赵帮胜, 覃小丽, 白莹. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部奥陶系马家沟组硫化氢成因——来自流体包裹体的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(2): 250-261.
[11]	张智, 赵苑瑾, 张喆, 蔡楠, 刘和兴, 马传华, 梁继文. 深水井开采制度对天然气水合物分解的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(2): 281-292.
[12]	魏兵, 钟梦颖, 赵金洲, 王典林, Kadet Valeriy, 游君昱. 微-纳米受限空间原油-天然气最小混相压力预测方法[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1604-1613.
[13]	刘凯旋, 陈践发, 付娆, 汪华, 罗冰, 戴鑫, 师肖飞, 董勍伟. 富氦天然气藏成藏特征及主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(11): 1652-1663.
[14]	杨雨, 文龙, 宋泽章, 张本健, 严威, 周刚, 田兴旺, 钟原, 和源, 马奎, 李堃宇, 杨岱林, 孙奕婷, 葛冰飞, 杨振中. 川中古隆起北部蓬莱气区多层系天然气勘探突破与潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(10): 1351-1368,1394.
[15]	周世琛, 周博, 薛世峰, 公彬. 基于离散元法的天然气水合物沉积物剪切带演化机理[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(1): 101-111.