四川盆地及邻区震旦纪末—寒武纪早期构造运动性质与作用

doi:10.7623/syxb201505003

石油学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 546-556,563.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201505003

四川盆地及邻区震旦纪末—寒武纪早期构造运动性质与作用

李伟, 刘静江, 邓胜徽, 张宝民, 周慧

中国石油勘探开发研究院提高石油采收率国家重点实验室北京 100083

收稿日期:2014-10-23 修回日期:2015-03-22 出版日期:2015-05-25 发布日期:2015-06-10
通讯作者: 李伟,男,1963年2月生,1987年获江汉石油学院学士学位,2004年获成都理工大学博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事油气成藏、油气田水文地质、石油与天然气地质综合评价与勘探实践研究。Email:lwe@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:李伟,男,1963年2月生,1987年获江汉石油学院学士学位,2004年获成都理工大学博士学位,现为中国石油勘探开发研究院高级工程师,主要从事油气成藏、油气田水文地质、石油与天然气地质综合评价与勘探实践研究。Email:lwe@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
中国石油天然气集团公司勘探与生产专项"四川盆地灯影组、龙王庙组地层及岩相古地理研究"(2012ZD01-02-03)资助。

The nature and role of Late Sinian-Early Cambrian tectonic movement in Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas

Li Wei, Liu Jingjiang, Deng Shenghui, Zhang Baomin, Zhou Hui

State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil Recovery, PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2014-10-23 Revised:2015-03-22 Online:2015-05-25 Published:2015-06-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近期在四川盆地震旦系—寒武系获得了天然气勘探的新突破,而对于震旦纪末—寒武纪早期构造运动的认识还存在较大争论。通过岩石学特征、地震剖面特征、沉积环境等方面的研究,认识到震旦纪末的构造运动与寒武纪早期的构造运动存在明显差异。研究认为桐湾运动是以整体隆升与沉降为特征,并发育三幕构造运动,即灯影组二段富藻层沉积末期的桐湾Ⅰ幕、灯影组二段沉积末期的桐湾Ⅱ幕与灯影组三段—灯影组四段沉积末期的桐湾Ⅲ幕,桐湾期的灯影组镶边碳酸盐台地还存在轻微裂化作用下的热液沉积。寒武纪早期的兴凯运动以裂陷为主,发育两幕构造运动,即麦地坪组沉积期的兴凯Ⅰ幕与筇竹寺组沉积期的兴凯Ⅱ幕,兴凯期的上扬子碳酸盐台地遭遇较强的裂解,热液作用普遍较强,但至兴凯Ⅱ期时,裂陷活动主要发生在川南—黔北地区,川中—川北较弱。桐湾期的隆升剥蚀不仅控制了三大岩溶风化壳的发育,且其形成的绵阳—宜宾—会东巨大侵蚀沟谷控制了下寒武统麦地坪组的泥岩与页岩为主的碎屑岩沉积;兴凯运动不仅控制了有利烃源岩的发育,且与桐湾运动一起控制了有利源-储配置区的分布。因此,四川盆地震旦纪末—早寒武世发育两类不同性质的构造运动,前者主要促进了储层的发育,后者主要促进了烃源岩的发育,二者共生组合形成了震旦系与寒武系的良好油气成藏组合。

关键词: 四川盆地, 震旦纪, 寒武纪, 桐湾运动, 兴凯运动, 灯影组, 麦地坪组, 筇竹寺组, 岩溶, 储层, 烃源岩, 热液作用

Abstract:

Recently, a new breakthrough has been made in natural gas exploration of Sinian-Cambrian Sichuan Basin, but there is also a big debate on the understanding of Late Sinian-Early Cambrian tectonic movement. Through the research on petrologic characteristics, seismic profile characteristics, sedimentary environment and other aspects, it is recognized that a great difference exists between the Late Sinian tectonic movement and Early Cambrian tectonic movement. It is considered that Tongwan tectonic movement is characterized by overall uplift and subsidence with three episodes of tectonic movement, i.e., Tongwan Episode I, II and III refers to the late sedimentary period of algae-rich layer in Member 2 of Dengying Formation, the late sedimentary period in Member 2 of Dengying Formation, and the late sedimentary period in Member 3 and Member 4 of Dengying Formation respectively. It is also considered that hydrothermal sedimentation exists in the rimmed carbonate platform of Dengying Formation in Tongwan period under the action of slight cracking. Moreover, the Early Cambrian Xingkai tectonic movement is dominated by riftogenesis in two episodes of tectonic movement, i.e., Xingkai Episode I and II refers to the sedimentary periods of Maidiping Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation respectively. The Upper Yangtze carbonate platform underwent intense cracking in Xingkai period, and hydrothermal process was generally strong. However, till Xingkai Episode II, rift activities mainly occurred in the south of Sichuan Basin and north of Guizhou, while weaker in Central and Northern Sichuan Basin. It is believed that the uplift and denudation not only controlled the development of three major karst weathering crusts in Tongwan period, and the huge Mianyang-Yibin-Huidong erosion gully was formed to control the clastic sediments dominated by mud and shale in Lower Cambrian Maidiping Formation. Xingkai movement controlled not only the development of favorable source rocks, but also the distribution of favorable source-reservoir configuration zones in combination with Tongwan movement. Therefore, two different tectonic movements were developed in Late Sinian-Early Cambrian Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas. These two tectonic movements promoted the development of reservoirs and source rocks respectively, of which the paragenetic association led to a favorable hydrocarbon accumulation assemblage in Sinian and Cambrian.

Key words: Sichuan Basin, Sinian, Cambrian, Tongwan tectonic movement, Xingkai tectonic movement, Dengying Formation, Maidiping Formation, Qiongzhusi Formation, karst, reservoir, source rock, hydrothermal process

中图分类号:

TE122.1

李伟, 刘静江, 邓胜徽, 张宝民, 周慧. 四川盆地及邻区震旦纪末—寒武纪早期构造运动性质与作用[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(5): 546-556,563.

Li Wei, Liu Jingjiang, Deng Shenghui, Zhang Baomin, Zhou Hui. The nature and role of Late Sinian-Early Cambrian tectonic movement in Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(5): 546-556,563.

参考文献

[1] 四川油气区石油地质志编写组.中国石油地质志(卷十、四川油气区)[M].北京:石油工业出版社, 1989.
Editorial Committee of Sichuan Oil and Gas Regions.China petroleum geology (Vol.10, Sichuan oil and gas regions)[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Publishing House, 1989.
[2] 郭正吾, 邓康龄, 韩永辉, 等.四川盆地形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社, 1996.
Guo Zhengwu, Deng Kangling, Han Yonghui, et al.Formation and evolution of Sichuan Basin[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1996.
[3] 邓康龄.四川盆地形成演化与油气勘探领域[J].天然气工业, 1992, 12(5):7-12.
Deng Kangling.Formation and evolution of Sichuan Basin and domains for oil and gas exploration[J].Natural Gas Industry, 1992, 12(5):7-12.
[4] 童崇光.四川盆地构造演化与油气聚集[M].北京:地质出版社, 1985.
Tong Chongguang.Tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation in Sichuan Basin[M].Beijing:The Geological Publishing House, 1985.
[5] 四川省地质矿产局.四川省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社, 1991.
Sichuan Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development.Regional geology of Sichuan Province[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1991.
[6] 杨雨, 黄先平, 张健, 等.四川盆地寒武系沉积前震旦系顶界岩溶地貌特征及其地质意义[J].天然气工业, 2014, 34(3):38-43.
Yang Yu, Huang Xianping, Zhang Jian, et al.Features and geologic significances of the top Sinian karst landform before the Cambrian deposition in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(3):38-43.
[7] 杜金虎, 邹才能, 徐春春, 等.川中古隆起龙王庙组特大型气田战略发现与理论技术创新[J].石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3)268-277.
Du Jinhu, Zou Caineng, Xu Chunchun, et al.Theoretical and technical innovations in strategic discovery of a giant gas field in Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation of central Sichuan paleo-uplift, Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3):268-277.
[8] 邹才能, 杜金虎, 徐春春, 等.四川盆地震旦系—寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J].石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3):278-293.
Zou Caineng, Du Jinhu, Xu Chunchun, et al.Formation, distribution, resource potential, prediction and discovery of the Sinian—Cambrian super-giant gas field, Sichuan basin, SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3):278-293.
[9] 谢增业, 魏国齐, 李剑, 等.中国海相碳酸盐岩大气田成藏特征与模式[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(增刊1):29-40.
Xie Zengye, Wei Guoqi, Li Jian, et al.Reservoir characteristics and accumulation modes of large carbonate gas fields in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(Supplement 1):29-40.
[10] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王社教, 等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):641-653.
Zou Caineng, Dong Dazhong, Wang Shejiao, et al.Geological characteristics, formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):641-653.
[11] 郭彤楼, 张汉荣.四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式[J].石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(1):28-36.
Guo Tonglou, Zhang Hanrong.Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field, Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1):28-36.
[12] Gradstein F M, Ogg J G, Smith A G, et al.A new geologic time scale, with special reference to Precambrian and Neogene[J].Episodes, 2004, 27(2):83-100.
[13] 刘鹏举, 尹崇玉, 陈寿铭, 等.华南峡东地区埃迪卡拉(震旦)纪年代地层划分初探[J].地质学报, 2012, 86(6):849-866.
Liu Pengju, Yin Chongyu, Chen Shouming, et al.Discussion on the chronostratigraphic subdivision of the Ediacaran(Sinian) in the Yangtze Gorges Area, South China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(6):849-866.
[14] 黄汲清, 任纪舜, 姜春发, 等.中国大地构造及其演化——1:400万中国大地构造图简要说明[M].北京:科学出版社, 1980:1-124.
Huang Jiqing, Ren Jishun, Jiang Chunfa, et al.Tectonic and the geotectonic devolution of China:a brief introduction of the tectonic map of China(1:4000000)[M].Beijing:Science Press, 1980:1-124.

[15] 罗志立.中国西南地区晚古生代以来地裂运动对石油等矿产形成的影响[J].四川地质学报, 1981, 2(1):1-22.
Luo Zhili.The influence on the formation oil and mineral resources from taphrogenesis movement since the late Paleozoic in southwest China[J].Acta Geologica Sichuan, 1981, 2(1):1-22.
[16] 罗志立.略论地裂运动与中国油气分布[J].中国地质科学学院院报, 1984(3):93-101.
Luo Zhili.A discussion of taphrogenesis and hydrocarbon distribution in China[J].Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 1984(3):93-101.
[17] 任纪舜, 王作勋, 陈炳蔚, 等.从全球看中国大地构造——中国及邻区大地构造图简要说明[M].北京:地质出版社, 1999:32-33.
Ren Jishun, Wang Zuoxun, Chen Bingwei, et al.Tectonics of China from a global scale:a brief introduction to the tectonic map of China and adjacent Areasl[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1999:32-33.
[18] 孙玮, 罗志立, 刘树根, 等.华南古板块兴凯地裂运动特征及对油气影响[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 33(5):1-8.
Sun Wei, Luo Zhili, Liu Shugen, et al.Characteristics of Xingkai taphrogenesis in South China and the effects on oil and gas[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition, 2011, 33(5):1-8.
[19] 刘树根, 孙玮, 罗志立, 等.兴凯地裂运动与四川盆地下组合油气勘探[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 40(5):511-520.
Liu Shugen, Sun Wei, Luo Zhili, et al.Xingkai Taphrogenesis and petroleum exploration from Upper Sinian to Cambrian Strata in Sichuan Basin, China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition, 2013, 40(5):511-520.
[20] 汪泽成, 姜华, 王铜山, 等.四川盆地桐湾期古地貌特征及成藏意义[J].石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3):305-312.
Wang Zecheng, Jiang Hua, Wang Tongshan, et al.Paleo-geomorphology formed during Tongwan tectonization in Sichuan Basin and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3):305-312.
[21] 黄汲清, 任纪舜, 姜春发, 等.对中国大地构造若干特点的新认识[J].地质学报, 1974, 48(1):36-52.
Huang Jiqing, Ren Jishun, Jiang Chunfa, et al.Some new observations on the geotectonic characteristics of China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 1974, 48(1):36-52.
[22] 侯方浩, 方少仙, 王兴志, 等.四川震旦系灯影组天然气藏储渗体的再认识[J].石油学报, 1999, 20(6):16-21.
Hou Fanghao, Fang Shaoxian, Wang Xingzhi, et al.Review on Sinian Dengying Formation reservoir and permeability in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1999, 20(6):16-21.
[23] 周永章.丹池盆地热水成因硅质岩的沉积地球化学特征[J].沉积学报, 1990, 8(3):75-83.
Zhou Yongzhang.On sedimentary geochemistry of siliceous rocks originated from thermal water in Nandan-Hechi Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1990, 8(3):75-83.
[24] 刘宝珺.沉积岩石学[M].北京:地质出版社, 1980:192-225.
Liu Baojun.Sedimentology[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1980:192-225.
[25] 刘宝珺, 许效松, 潘杏南, 等.中国南方古大陆沉积地壳演化与成矿[M].北京:科学出版社, 1993:1-236.
Liu Baojun, Xu Xiaosong, Pan Xingnan, et al.South China ancient continental sedimentary crust evolution and mineral[M].Beijing:Science Press, 1993:1-236.
[26] 彭军, 徐望国.湘西上震旦统层状硅质岩沉积环境的地球化学标志[J].地球化学, 2001, 30(3):293-298.
Peng Jun, Xu Wangguo.Geochemical characteristics of depositional environment of the Upper Sinian bedded siliceous rocks in Western Hunan[J].Geochimica, 2001, 30(3):293-298.
[27] 马文辛, 刘树根, 陈翠华, 等.渝东地区震旦系灯影组硅质岩地球化学特征[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2011, 30(2):160-170.
Ma Wenxin, Liu Shugen, Chen Cuihua, et al.Geochemical characteristics of the siliceous rock in the upper Sinian denying formation in the eastern Chongqing, China[J].Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2011, 30(2):160-170.
[28] 范嘉松, 吴亚生.贵州中三叠统上部垄头组的沉积性质——再论其钙结壳的成因[J].地质学报, 2004, 78(2):149-155.
Fan Jiasong, Wu Yasheng.Sedimentological nature of Late Middle Triassic Longtou Formation——re-discussion on the origin of its caliche crusts[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2004, 78(2):149-155.
[29] 张宝民, 刘静江.中国岩溶储集层分类与特征及相关的理论问题[J].石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(1):12-29.
Zhang Baomin, Liu Jingjiang.Classification and characteristics of karst reservoirs in China and related theories[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(1):12-29.
[30] Meylan M A, Glasby G P, Knedler K E, et al.Metalliferous deep-sea sediments[M]//Wolf K H.Handbook of Strata -bound and Stratiform Ore Deposits.Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1981, Vol.9:77-178.
[31] 宋文海.乐山一龙女寺古隆起大中型气田成藏条件研究[J].天然气工业, 1996(增刊):13-26.
Song Wenhai.Research on reservoir-formed conditions of large-medium gas fields of Leshan-Longnusi palaeohigh[J].Natural Gas Industry, 1996(Supplement):13-26.
[32] 李国辉, 李翔.四川盆地加里东古隆起震旦系气藏成藏控制因素[J].石油与天然气地质, 2000, 21(1):80-83.
Li Guohui, Li Xiang.Controlling factors of Sinian gas pools in Caledonian paleouplift, Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology, 2000, 21(1):80-83.
[33] 赵海滨, 莫宣学, 徐受民, 等.黑龙江新开岭变质核杂岩的组成及其演化[J].地质科学, 2007, 42(1):176-188.
Zhao Haibin, Mo Xuanxue, Xu Shoumin, et al.Composition and evolution of the Xinkailing metamorphic core complexes in Heilongjiang province[J].Chinese Journal of Geology, 2007, 42(1):176-188.
[34] 黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社, 1993:1-350.
Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Heilongjiang Province.Regional geology of Heilongjiang Province[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1993:1-350.
[35] 张位华, 姜立君, 高慧, 等.贵州寒武系底部黑色硅质岩成因及沉积环境探讨[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2003, 22(2):174-178.
Zhang Weihua, Jiang Lijun, Gao Hui, et al.Study on sedimentary environment and origin of black siliceous rocks of the Lower Cambrian in Guizhou Province[J].Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2003, 22(2):174-178.
[36] 陈志明, 陈其英.扬子地台早寒武世梅树村早期的古地理及其磷块岩展布特征[J].地质科学, 1987, 22(3):246-257.
Chen Zhiming, Chen Qiying.Paleogeography of Yangtze plateform and the characteristics of the phosphorite distribution of early Meishucun stage, early Cambrian[J].Scientia Geologica Sinica, 1987, 22(3):246-257.
[37] 四川省地质局第二区域地质测量大队.中华人民共和国区域地质测量报告-峨嵋幅-H-48-XX 上册[R].1971, 8:17. Second geological team of Sichuan province Geological bureau.The regional geological survey report of the People's Republic of China-Emei amplitude-H-48XX(Volume 1)[R].1971, 8:17.
[38] 梅庆华, 何登发, 文竹, 等.四川盆地乐山—龙女寺古隆起地质结构及构造演化[J].石油学报, 2014, 31(1):11-25. Mei Qinghua, He Dengfa, Wen Zhu, et al.Geologic structure and tectonic evolution of Leshan-Longnvsi paleo-uplift in Sichuan Basin, China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(1):11-25.
[39] 李伟, 余华琪, 邓鸿斌.四川盆地中南部寒武系地层划分对比与沉积演化特征[J].石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(6):681-690. Li Wei, Yu Huaqi, Deng Hongbin.Stratigraphic division and correlation and sedimentary characteristics of the Cambrian in central-southern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(6):681-690.
[40] 孙玮, 罗志立, 刘树根, 等.华南古板块兴凯地裂运动特征及对油气影响[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2011, 33(5):1-8. Sun Wei, Luo Zhili, Liu Shugen, et al.Characteristics of Xingkai taphrogenesis in south China and the effects on oil and gas[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition, 2011, 33(5):1-8.
[41] 韩辉, 李大华, 马勇, 等.四川盆地东北地区下寒武统海相页岩气成因:来自气体组分和碳同位素组成的启示[J].石油学报, 2013, 34(3):453-459. Han Hui, Li Dahua, Ma Yong, et al.The origin of marine shale gas in the northeastern Sichuan Basin, China:implications from chemical composition and stable carbon isotope of desorbed gas[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(3):453-459.

四川盆地及邻区震旦纪末—寒武纪早期构造运动性质与作用

The nature and role of Late Sinian-Early Cambrian tectonic movement in Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋金民, 江青春, 刘树根, 金鑫, 范建平, 李智武, 黄士鹏, 苏旺, 杨迪, 姜华, 叶玥豪, 王佳蕊, 王俊轲, 任杉. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段含海泡石层系古环境与沉积格局指示意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 914-931.
[2]	王清华. 塔北西部喀拉玉尔衮构造带上寒武统下丘里塔格组油气勘探突破及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 615-628.
[3]	鲁雪松, 桂丽黎, 汪泽成, 柳少波, 刘强, 范俊佳, 陈玮岩, 马行陟, 姜华, 付小东, 李文正, 钟源, 李堃宇, 谢武仁. 四川盆地中部走滑断裂活动时间与控藏作用——来自断裂带胶结物U-Pb定年和流体包裹体的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(4): 642-658.
[4]	惠沙沙, 庞雄奇, 谌卓恒, 王琛茜, 施砍园, 胡涛, 胡耀, 李敏, 梅术星, 黎茂稳. 四川盆地海相页岩孔隙类型对孔隙空间贡献定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(3): 531-547.
[5]	支东明, 李建忠, 杨帆, 陈旋, 肖冬生, 王波, 武超, 于海跃. 吐哈盆地丘东洼陷侏罗系致密砂岩气勘探突破及意义[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 348-357.
[6]	杨德彬, 何新明, 张恒, 汪彦, 刘遥, 王明. 塔河油田主体区奥陶系表层岩溶带智能识别及缝洞发育规律[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(2): 374-389,411.
[7]	谭茂金, 武宏亮, 王思宇, 杜广慧, 白洋, 王谦. 中国海相页岩气测井评价技术进展与发展方向[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 241-260.
[8]	王飞宇, 冯伟平, 庞雄奇, 郭秋麟, 贾承造. 全油气系统生、排烃和运聚定量分析中的关键问题与解决途径[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1434-1444.
[9]	刘可禹, 刘建良. 盆地沉积充填演化与含油气系统耦合模拟方法在超深层油气成藏模拟中的应用——以四川盆地中部震旦系灯影组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1445-1458.
[10]	郭秋麟, 黄少英, 卢玉红, 王建, 吴晓智, 陈宁生. 塔里木盆地台盆区下古生界油气系统模拟及资源分布预测[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1459-1471.
[11]	武瑾, 李海, 杨学锋, 赵圣贤, 郭伟, 孙玉平, 刘永, 刘兆龙. 深层海相页岩纹层类型、组合及其对储层品质的影响——以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1517-1531.
[12]	贾承造, 张荣虎, 魏国齐, 王珂, 余朝丰, 曾庆鲁, 司学强. 天山陆内冲断带构造动力控储效应与超深层规模储层[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1191-1205.
[13]	夏钦禹, 马新华, 郭振华, 李文, 江林, 张林, 李新豫, 刘曦翔, 罗瑞兰, 闫海军, 刘钰洋, 阳成. 川中高石梯区块灯影组四段古岩溶带及内部储层分布特征[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1299-1312,1332.
[14]	殷树军, 文政, 金雪英, 闫伟林, 王春燕, 师江波, 夏文豪, 李金奉, 聂妮, 郑盛敦. 泥灰岩非常规储层特征及测井表征方法——以四川盆地合川—潼南地区茅口组一段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(7): 1105-1117.
[15]	高永海, 尹法领, 张党生, 孙小辉, 赵欣欣, 陈野, 孙宝江. 水合物储层水平井钻井井筒-储层耦合模型与井壁稳定性分析[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(7): 1151-1166.