油气资源评价方法研究进展与新一代评价软件系统

doi:10.7623/syxb201510014

石油学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 1305-1314.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201510014

油气资源评价方法研究进展与新一代评价软件系统

郭秋麟¹, 陈宁生¹, 刘成林², 谢红兵^1,2, 吴晓智¹, 王社教¹, 胡俊文¹, 高日丽¹

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院北京 100083;
2. 中国石油大学地球科学学院北京 102249

收稿日期:2015-04-20 修回日期:2015-08-22 出版日期:2015-10-25 发布日期:2015-11-09
通讯作者: 郭秋麟,男,1963年10月生,1985年获华东石油学院石油地质专业学士学位,2008年获中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所矿物学、岩石学与矿床学专业博士学位,现为中国石油天然气集团公司高级技术专家、中国石油勘探开发研究院教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气资源评价、盆地数值模拟等方向的研究。Email:qlguo@petrochina.com.cn
作者简介:郭秋麟,男,1963年10月生,1985年获华东石油学院石油地质专业学士学位,2008年获中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所矿物学、岩石学与矿床学专业博士学位,现为中国石油天然气集团公司高级技术专家、中国石油勘探开发研究院教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气资源评价、盆地数值模拟等方向的研究。Email:qlguo@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项"岩性地层区带、圈闭评价与储层预测技术研究"(2011ZX05001)和中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项"中国石油第四次油气资源评价"(2013E-0502)资助。

Research advance of hydrocarbon resource assessment method and a new assessment software system

Guo Qiulin¹, Chen Ningsheng¹, Liu Chenglin², Xie Hongbing^1,2, Wu Xiaozhi¹, Wang Shejiao¹, Hu Junwen¹, Gao Rili¹

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Geoscience School, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2015-04-20 Revised:2015-08-22 Online:2015-10-25 Published:2015-11-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在梳理国外常规与非常规油气资源评价方法研究现状的基础上,归纳出国外重要的常规油气资源评价方法及最新的非常规油气资源评价方法,指出多方法、多学科和多领域的知识综合是评价方法的发展方向,油气资源空间分布定量预测与计算机可视化技术相结合是评价技术的发展方向。通过总结中国历次全国性的油气资源评价特点,分析中国油气资源评价方法体系存在的不足,优选出适合中国勘探现状的评价方法,建立了常规与非常规油气资源评价方法体系,研发了常规与非常规油气资源评价系统。介绍了评价系统的结构、主要功能模块和5大特色技术,即以小面元法为核心的非常规油气资源评价技术、三维三相达西流模拟技术、基于刻度区解剖的类比评价技术、经济评价与环境评价技术和基于WEB-GIS的数据库管理技术。展望了评价系统的推广应用前景。

关键词: 资源评价, 油气资源, 非常规资源, 评价软件系统, 统计法

Abstract:

Based on analyses on research status of foreign conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resource assessment methods, the key conventional hydrocarbon resource assessment methods and brand-new unconventional hydrocarbon resource assessment methods were summarized in this study. It is pointed out that knowledge fusion of multiple methods, multiple disciplines and multiple domains is the development direction of hydrocarbon assessment method, and integration of computer visualization technology with quantitative prediction for spatial distribution of hydrocarbon resources is the developing orientation of assessment technologies. The deficiencies of China's hydrocarbon resource assessment systems are analyzed based on the characteristics of all previous hydrocarbon resource assessments in China, so as to select the optimal assessment methods for current hydrocarbon exploration. On this basis, the conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resource evaluation methodology and assessment system are developed. In this study, the structure and main function modules of assessment system are introduced, as well as five major technologies, i.e., the conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon resource assessment technology with small patch method as a core, 3D three-phase Darcy flow simulation technology, analogy assessment technology based on dissection of calibrated units, economic and environment evaluation technology, and database management technology based on WEB-GIS technology. Moreover, the popularization and application prospect of such assessment system is expected.

Key words: resources assessment, hydrocarbon resources, unconventional resources, assessment software system, statistics methods

中图分类号:

TE155

郭秋麟, 陈宁生, 刘成林, 谢红兵, 吴晓智, 王社教, 胡俊文, 高日丽. 油气资源评价方法研究进展与新一代评价软件系统[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(10): 1305-1314.

Guo Qiulin, Chen Ningsheng, Liu Chenglin, Xie Hongbing, Wu Xiaozhi, Wang Shejiao, Hu Junwen, Gao Rili. Research advance of hydrocarbon resource assessment method and a new assessment software system[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(10): 1305-1314.

参考文献

[1] 邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质学[M].第2版.北京:地质出版社,2014:15-16.
Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Hou Lianhua,et al.Unconventional petroleum geology[M].2nd ed.Beijing:Geological Press,2014:15-16.
[2] 邱振,邹才能,李建忠,等.非常规油气资源评价进展与未来展望[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(2):238-246.
Qiu Zhen,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al.Unconventional petroleum resources assessment:progress and future prospects[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(2):238-246.
[3] 邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望:以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):173-187.
Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Wu Songtao,et al.Types,characteristics,genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):173-187.
[4] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136.
Jia Chengzao,Zheng Min,Zhang Yongfeng.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.
[5] White D A,Gehman H M.Methods of estimating oil and gas resources[J].AAPG Bulletin,1979,63(12):2183-2192.
[6] Houghton J C.Use of the truncated shifted pareto distribution in assessing size distribution of oil and gas fields[J].Mathematical Geology,1988,20(8):907-937.
[7] Houghton J C,Dolton G L,Mast R F,et al.U.S.geological survey estimation procedure for accumulation size distributions by play[J].AAPG Bulletin,1993,77(3):454-466.
[8] Gautier D L,Mast R F.U.S.geological survey methodology for the 1995 National Assessment[J].AAPG,1995,79(1):1-10.
[9] Attanasi E D,Charpentier R R.Comparison of two probability distributions used to model sizes of undiscovered oil and gas accumulations:does the tail wag the assessment[J].Mathematical Geology,2002,34(6):767-777.
[10] Klett T R,Gautier D L,Ahlbrandt T S.An evaluation of the U.S.geological survey world petroleum assessment 2000[J].AAPG Bulletin,2005,89(8):1033-1042.
[11] Kaufman G M,Balcer Y,Kruyt D.A probabilistic model of oil and gas discovery[M]//Haun J D.Methods of Estimating the Volume of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources. AAPG Studies in Geology Series No.1.Tuisa,Oklahoma:AAPG,1975:113-142.
[12] Lee P J,Wang P C C.Probabilistic formulation of a method for the evaluation of petroleum resources[J].Mathematical Geology,1983,15(1):163-181.
[13] Lee P J.Statistical methods for estimating petroleum resources[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2008:234.
[14] Chen Zhuoheng,Osadetz K G.Undiscovered petroleum accumulation mapping using model-based stochastic simulation[J].Mathematical Geology,2006,38(1):1-16.
[15] Chen Zhuoheng,Osadetz K G.Geological risk mapping and prospect evaluation using multivariate and Bayesian statistical methods,western Sverdrup basin of Canada[J].AAPG Bulletin,2006,90(6):859-872.
[16] Chen Zhuoheng,Sinding-Larsen R.Resource assessment using a modified anchored method[C]//Proceedings of the 29th International Geological Congress.Kyoto,Japan,1992.
[17] Meisner J,Demirman F.The creaming method:a Bayesian procedure to forecast future oil and gas discoveries in mature exploration provinces[J].Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A,1981,144(1):1-31.
[18] Forman D J,Hinde A L.Improved statistical method for assessment of undiscovered petroleum resources[J].AAPG Bulletin,1985,69(1):106-118.
[19] 王素花,郑俊章,高书琴.俄罗斯石油资源现状及开发潜力[J].国际石油经济,2014(3):65-72.
Wang Suhua,Zheng Junzhang,Gao Shuqin.Present and future oil resources in Russia[J].International Petroleum Economics, 2014(3):65-72.
[20] Schmoker J W.Resource assessment perspectives for unconventional gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1993-1999.
[21] Salazar J,McVay D A,Lee W J.Development of an improved methodology to assess potential gas resources[J].Natural Resources Research,2010,19(4):253-268.
[22] Hood K C,Yurewicz D A,Steffen K J.Assessing continuous resources-building the bridge between static and dynamic analyses[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2012,60(3):112-133.
[23] 郭秋麟,陈宁生,吴晓智,等.致密油资源评价方法研究[J].中国石油勘探,2013,18(2):67-76.
Guo Qiulin,Chen Ningsheng,Wu Xiaozhi,et al.Method for assessment of tight oil resources[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2013,18(2):67-76.
[24] 王社教,蔚远江,郭秋麟,等.致密油资源评价新进展[J].石油学报,2014,35(6):1095-1105.
Wang Shejiao,Yu Yuanjiang,Guo Qiulin,et al.New advance in resources evaluation of tight oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(6):1095-1105.
[25] Almanza A.Integrated three dimensional geological model of the Devonian Bakken formation elm coulee field,Williston basin:Richland county Montana[D].Golden,Colorado:Colorado School of Mines,2011:124.
[26] Olea R A,Cook T A,Coleman J L.A methodology for the assessment of unconventional (continuous) resources with an application to the greater natural buttes gas field,Utah[J].Natural Resources Research,2010,19(4):237-251.
[27] 谌卓恒,Osadetz K G.西加拿大沉积盆地Cardium组致密油资源评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(3):320-328.
Chen Zhuoheng,Osadetz K G.An assessment of tight oil resource potential in the upper cretaceous cardium formation,western Canada sedimentary basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):320-328.
[28] 郭秋麟,周长迁,陈宁生,等.非常规油气资源评价方法研究[J].岩性油气藏,2011,23(4):12-19.
Guo Qiulin,Zhou Changqian,Chen Ningsheng,et al.Evaluation methods for unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2011,23(4):12-19.
[29] Jarvie D M,Hill R J,Ruble T E,et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:the mississippian barnett shale of north-central texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
[30] Modica C J,Lapierre S G.Estimation of kerogen porosity in source rocks as a function of thermal transformation:example from the Mowry shale in the Powder River basin of Wyoming[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(1):87-108.
[31] Chen Zhuoheng,Osadetz K,Liu Yexin,et al.A revised ΔlogR method for shale play resource potential evaluation,an example from Devonian Duvernay formation,western Canada sedimentary basin[C]//Proceedings of the 15th IMAG Conference.Madrid:IMAG,2013.
[32] 杨华,李士祥,刘显阳.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):1-11.
Yang Hua,Li Shixiang,Liu Xianyang.Characteristics and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):1-11.
[33] 张荣虎,杨海军,王俊鹏,等.库车坳陷超深层低孔致密砂岩储层形成机制与油气勘探意义[J].石油学报, 2014,35(6):1057-1069.
Zhang Ronghu,Yang Haijun,Wang Junpeng,et al.The formation mechanism and exploration significance of ultra-deep,low-porosity and tight sandstone reservoirs in Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(6):1057-1069.

油气资源评价方法研究进展与新一代评价软件系统

Research advance of hydrocarbon resource assessment method and a new assessment software system

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	贾承造, 庞雄奇, 郭秋麟, 陈掌星, 王飞宇, 刘国勇, 高永进, 施砍园, 姜福杰, 姜林. 基于成因法评价油气资源:全油气系统理论和新一代盆地模拟技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1399-1416.
[2]	庞雄奇, 贾承造, 郭秋麟, 陈掌星, 王飞宇, 刘国勇, 高永进, 施砍园, 姜福杰, 姜林. 全油气系统理论用于常规和非常规油气资源评价的盆地模拟技术原理及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1417-1433.
[3]	王飞宇, 冯伟平, 庞雄奇, 郭秋麟, 贾承造. 全油气系统生、排烃和运聚定量分析中的关键问题与解决途径[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1434-1444.
[4]	姜福杰, 郭婧, 庞雄奇, 陈迪, 王建伟, 汪英勋, 李亚茜, 陈雪, 郭婷玮, 房舟, 王晓昊, 齐振国, 文嘉豪. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷全油气系统3类油气资源联合评价[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1472-1486.
[5]	宋振响, 周卓明, 江兴歌, 陈拥锋, 马中良, 罗昕, 李振明. 常规-非常规油气资源一体化评价方法——基于全油气系统理论和TSM盆地模拟技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(9): 1487-1499.
[6]	王建, 郭秋麟, 赵晨蕾, 王玉满, 于京都, 柳庄小雪, 陈宁生. 中国主要盆地页岩油气资源潜力及发展前景[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(12): 2033-2044.
[7]	窦立荣, 李大伟, 温志新, 王兆明, 米石云, 张倩. 全球油气资源评价历程及展望[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(8): 1035-1048.
[8]	庞雄奇, 贾承造, 宋岩, 陈君青, 施砍园, 庞礴, 姜林, 姜福杰, 陈冬霞, 庞宏, 胡涛, 张思玉, 孙耀玺. 全油气系统定量评价:方法原理与实际应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 727-759.
[9]	郭秋麟, 侯连华, 王建, 柳庄小雪, 罗霞, 陈宁生. 原位转化页岩油资源潜力评价方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(12): 1750-1757.
[10]	王社教, 李峰, 闫家泓, 胡俊文, 王凯鸿, 任衡泰. 油田地热资源评价方法及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 553-564.
[11]	毕海滨, 孟昊, 高日丽, 郑婧, 徐小林, 鞠秀娟, 牛伟, 张劲, 周明庆, 赵丽华. 页岩气未开发区单井可采储量评估方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(5): 565-573.
[12]	朱明, 张向涛, 黄玉平, 朱俊章, 龙祖烈, 史玉玲, 石创, 张小龙. 珠江口盆地烃源岩特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(s1): 53-68.
[13]	郭秋麟, 武娜, 闫伟, 陈宁生. 深层天然气资源评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(4): 383-394.
[14]	李登华, 李建忠, 张斌, 杨家静, 汪少勇. 四川盆地侏罗系致密油形成条件、资源潜力与甜点区预测[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(7): 740-752.
[15]	郭秋麟, 武娜, 陈宁生, 任洪佳, 杨智, 谢红兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组第7油层组致密油资源评价[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(6): 658-665.