高压环境双水平井SAGD三维物理模拟实验

doi:10.7623/syxb201704009

石油学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 453-460.DOI: 10.7623/syxb201704009

高压环境双水平井SAGD三维物理模拟实验

田杰¹, 刘慧卿¹, 庞占喜¹, 赵卫¹, 高振南², 芮松霞³

1. 中国石油大学石油工程教育部重点实验室北京 102249;
2. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司渤海研究院天津 300459;
3. 中国石油辽河油田公司钻采工艺研究院辽宁盘锦 124010

收稿日期:2016-09-21 修回日期:2017-02-08 出版日期:2017-04-25 发布日期:2017-05-04
通讯作者: 田杰,男,1990年10月生,2012年获长江大学学士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)油气田开发工程专业博士研究生,主要从事稠油热采物理模拟与数值模拟研究工作。Email:tjcupb@yeah.net
作者简介:田杰,男,1990年10月生,2012年获长江大学学士学位,现为中国石油大学(北京)油气田开发工程专业博士研究生,主要从事稠油热采物理模拟与数值模拟研究工作。Email:tjcupb@yeah.net
基金资助:
国家重大科技专项（2016ZX05031-003-004）资助。

Experiment of 3D physical simulation on dual horizontal well SAGD under high pressure condition

Tian Jie¹, Liu Huiqing¹, Pang Zhanxi¹, Zhao Wei¹, Gao Zhennan², Rui Songxia³

1. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering of the Ministry of Education, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
2. Bohai Research Institute of Tianjin Branch, CNOOC China Limited,Tianjin 300459, China;
3. Drilling and Production Technology Research Institute, PetroChina Liaohe Oilfield Company, Liaoning Panjin 124010, China

Received:2016-09-21 Revised:2017-02-08 Online:2017-04-25 Published:2017-05-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对原始地层压力较高且难于在短期内降压的特稠油油藏，为了研究双水平井SAGD在高压环境下的开发效果，利用高温、高压三维物理模拟系统进行了SAGD物理模拟实验，并分析了在原始地层压力较高的特稠油油藏中进行SAGD生产的各项特征。研究结果表明：与低压环境下的SAGD生产过程相比，在高压环境下蒸汽腔发育过程虽然也分为3个阶段，但是蒸汽腔体积小，横向扩展范围有限；生产过程中没有出现稳产阶段，产油速率和油汽比在达到最大值以后迅速降低，大量原油在高含水和低油汽比阶段被产出；生产过程中热损失速率先缓慢、后迅速增加，最后保持稳定，与蒸汽腔发育的3个阶段相对应。根据实验研究结果可知，在高压环境下进行SAGD生产难以取得较为理想的开发效果，低压环境下SAGD开发的采收率远高于高压环境下SAGD的采收率。因此，高压环境下实施SAGD不能有效释放蒸汽潜热从而提高稠油油藏采收率，在能降低油藏压力的条件下，应首先利用适当工艺措施降低油藏平均压力，再实施SAGD开发。

关键词: 热力采油, 蒸汽辅助重力泄油, 高压环境, 双水平井, 物理模拟

Abstract:

To study the development effect of dual horizontal well using steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) technology under high pressure condition, the physical simulation experiment of SAGD process was conducted with the high-temperature and high-pressure 3D physical simulation system for ultra-heavy oil reservoirs with relatively high original pressure and depressurizing difficulty in a short term. Meanwhile, various characteristics of SAGD production in ultra-heavy oil reservoirs with high original pressure were analyzed. The research results show that compared with SAGD production process in the low-pressure environment, the development process of steam chamber in a high-pressure environment can also be divided into three stages, but steam chamber volume is small with limited lateral extension. There is no stable production stage during the production process, and oil yield rate and oil-steam ratio are decreased rapidly after reaching the maximum. A large amount of crude oil is produced in high water cut and low oil-steam ratio stage. In the production process, heat loss rate is increased slowly at first and then grows rapidly, and finally keeps stable, corresponding to the three development stages of steam chamber. According to the experimental research results, it can be known that the desired development results are difficult to be obtained through SAGD process in the high pressure environment, while the recovery rate of SAGD process in the low pressure environment is far more than that in the high pressure environment. Therefore, the latent heat of the steam is unable to be effectively released to enhance oil recovery during SAGD production in high pressure environment. Moreover, the average pressure of reservoir should be reduced first by using appropriate technological measures under the condition of reservoir depressurization, followed by SAGD process.

Key words: thermal recovery, steam assisted gravity drainage, high pressure environment, dual horizontal well, physical simulation

中图分类号:

TE357.4

田杰, 刘慧卿, 庞占喜, 赵卫, 高振南, 芮松霞. 高压环境双水平井SAGD三维物理模拟实验[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(4): 453-460.

Tian Jie, Liu Huiqing, Pang Zhanxi, Zhao Wei, Gao Zhennan, Rui Songxia. Experiment of 3D physical simulation on dual horizontal well SAGD under high pressure condition[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(4): 453-460.

参考文献

[1] DONG Xiaohu,LIU Huiqing,HOU Jirui,et al. Multi-thermal fluid assisted gravity drainage process:a new improved-oil-recovery technique for thick heavy oil reservoir[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2015,133:1-11.
[2] 吴正彬,庞占喜,刘慧卿,等.稠油油藏高温凝胶改善蒸汽驱开发效果可视化实验[J].石油学报,2015,36(11):1421-1426.
WU Zhengbin,PANG Zhanxi,LIU Huiqing,et al.A visible experiment on adoption of high-temperature gel for improving the development effect of steam flooding in heavy oil reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(11):1421-1426.
[3] 何聪鸽,穆龙新,许安著,等.稠油油藏蒸汽吞吐加热半径及产能预测新模型[J].石油学报,2015,36(12):1564-1570.
HE Congge,MU Longxin,XU Anzhu,et al.A new model of steam soaking heating radius and productivity prediction for heavy oil reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015,36(12):1564-1570.
[4] BUTLER R M.Thermal recovery of oil and bitumen[M].Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall,1991:285-357.
[5] 霍进,樊玉新,桑林翔,等.浅层超稠油蒸汽辅助重力泄油开发理论与实践[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2014.
HUO Jin,FAN Yuxin,SANG Linxiang,et al.The theory and practice of steam assisted gravity drainage in shallow super heavy oil reservoir[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2014.
[6] EDMUNDS N R,KOVALSKY J A,GITTINS S D,et al.Review of phase a steam-assisted gravity-drainage test[J].SPE Reservoir Engineering,1994,9(2):119-124.
[7] AHERNE A L,MAINI B.Fluid movement in the SAGD process:a review of the dover project[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2008,47(1):31-37.
[8] THIMM H F.Low pressure SAGD operations[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2005,44(9):58-61.
[9] BIRRELL G.Heat transfer ahead of a SAGD Steam chamber,a study of thermocouple data from phase b of the underground test facility (Dover Project)[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2001,42(3):40-47.
[10] SHIN H,POLIKAR M.Optimizing the SAGD process in three major Canadian oil-sands areas[R].SPE 95754,2005.
[11] NASR T N,GOLBECK H,KORPANY G,et al.SAGD operating strategies[R].SPE 50411,1998.
[12] WEI Shaolei,CHENG Linsong,HUANG Wenjun,et al.Prediction for steam chamber development and production performance in SAGD process[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2014,19:303-310.
[13] MOHAMMADZADEH O,REZAEI N,CHATZIS I.Production characteristics of the steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and solvent-aided SAGD (SA-SAGD) processes using a 2-D macroscale physical model[J].Energy & Fuels,2012,26(7):4346-4365.
[14] AL-BAHLANI A M,BABADAGLI T.SAGD laboratory experimental and numerical simulation studies:a review of current status and future issues[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2009,68(3/4):135-150.
[15] AL BAHLANI A M M,BABADAGLI T.A critical review of the status of SAGD:where are we and what is next[R].SPE 113283,2008.
[16] MILLER K A,XIAO Y.Improving the performance of classic SAGD with offsetting vertical producers[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2008,47(2):22-27.
[17] 张运军,沈德煌,高永荣,等.二氧化碳气体辅助SAGD物理模拟实验[J].石油学报,2014,35(6):1147-1152.
ZHANG Yunjun,SHEN Dehuang,GAO Yongrong,et al.Physical simulation experiments on CO₂ injection technology during steam assisted gravity drainage process[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(6):1147-1152.
[18] 高永荣,刘尚奇,沈德煌,等.氮气辅助SAGD开采技术优化研究[J].石油学报,2009,30(5):717-721.
GAO Yongrong,LIU Shangqi,SHEN Dehuang,et al.Optimization of N2 injection technology during steam assisted gravity drainage process[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(5):717-721.
[19] 马德胜,郭嘉,昝成,等.蒸汽辅助重力泄油改善汽腔发育均匀性物理模拟[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(2):188-193.
MA Desheng,GUO Jia,ZAN Cheng,et al.Physical simulation of improving the uniformity of steam chamber growth in the steam assisted gravity drainage[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(2):188-193.
[20] 徐长贵,王冰洁,王飞龙,等.辽东湾坳陷新近系特稠油成藏模式与成藏过程-以旅大5-2北油田为例[J].石油学报,2016,37(5):599-609.
XU Changgui,WANG Bingjie,WANG Feilong,et al.Neogene extra heavy oil accumulation model and process in Liaodong Bay depression:a case study of Lvda 5-2 N oilfield[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(5):599-609.
[21] 李萍,刘志龙,邹剑,等.渤海旅大27-2油田蒸汽吞吐先导试验注采工程[J].石油学报,2016,37(2):242-247.
LI Ping,LIU Zhilong,ZOU Jian,et al.Injection and production project of pilot test on steam huff-puff in oilfield LD27-2,Bohai Sea[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(2):242-247.
[22] 李秀峦,刘昊,罗健,等.非均质油藏双水平井SAGD三维物理模拟[J].石油学报,2014,35(3):536-542.
LI Xiuluan,LIU Hao,LUO Jian,et al.3D physical simulation on dual horizontal well SAGD in heterogeneous reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(3):536-542.
[23] 刘志波,程林松,纪佑军,等.蒸汽与天然气驱(SAGP)开采特征-与蒸汽辅助重力泄油(SAGD)对比分析[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(1):79-83.
LIU Zhibo,CHENG Linsong,JI Youjun,et al.Production features of steam and gas push:Comparative analysis with steam assisted gravity drainage[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(1):79-83.
[24] 纪佑军,程林松,刘其成,等.超稠油油藏蒸汽与非凝析气驱油数字化实验[J].石油学报,2010,31(4):602-606.
JI Youjun,CHENG Linsong,LIU Qicheng,et al.Digital experiment on steam and in-condensable gas push for extra heavy oil reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(4):602-606.

高压环境双水平井SAGD三维物理模拟实验

Experiment of 3D physical simulation on dual horizontal well SAGD under high pressure condition

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	石兰香, 彭栋梁, 席长丰, 冯世博, 李松岩. 丙烷与二甲醚辅助SAGD开采规律二维物理模拟实验[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(6): 999-1008.
[2]	东晓虎, 王剑, 刘慧卿, 田冀, 张琪琛, 郑强, 卢川. 高含水层油砂SAGD相似物理模拟实验[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(5): 658-667,718.
[3]	鹿腾, 班晓春, 李兆敏, 高永荣, 郭二鹏, 杨建平, 马宏斌, 王宏远, 魏耀. 烟道气辅助SAGD蒸汽腔扩展机理[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(8): 1072-1080.
[4]	胡勇, 李熙喆, 徐轩, 梅青燕, 陈颖莉, 王继平, 焦春艳, 郭长敏, 贾玉泽. 含水致密砂岩气藏可动用储量评价新方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 332-340.
[5]	朱华银, 王粟, 张敏, 武志德, 石磊. 盐穴储气库全周期注采模拟——以JT储气库X1和X2盐腔为例[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(3): 367-377.
[6]	张胜飞, 孙新革, 苟燕, 张忠义, 王红庄, 周晓义, 解阳波, 吕柏林. 流量控制器在SAGD技术中的应用现状及思考[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(10): 1395-1404.
[7]	胡婧, 郭辽原, 孙刚正, 吴晓玲, 宋永亭, 林军章, 汪卫东, 曹嫣镔, 王增林. 动态驱替内源微生物生长代谢与驱油效率关系[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1127-1134.
[8]	吴俊晨, 范宜仁, 曹军涛, 范卓颖, 王小龙, 吴飞. 基于大尺寸地层模型的砂岩储层油基钻井液侵入模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(11): 1407-1414.
[9]	高树生, 刘华勋, 叶礼友, 胡志明, 安为国. 页岩气井全生命周期物理模拟实验及数值反演[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(4): 435-444.
[10]	苏伟, 侯吉瑞, 李海波, 赵腾, 席园园. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏注氮气泡沫可行性及影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(4): 436-443.
[11]	梁金中, 王伯军, 关文龙, 侯平舒, 彭妥, 苗利军. 稠油油藏火烧油层吞吐技术与矿场试验[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(3): 324-332.
[12]	宗艳波, 王磊, 史晓锋. SAGD成对水平井磁导向测距仪研制与应用[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(11): 1428-1434.
[13]	杨正明, 刘学伟, 张仲宏, 周拓, 赵淑霞. 致密油藏分段压裂水平井注二氧化碳吞吐物理模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(6): 724-729.
[14]	吴正彬, 庞占喜, 刘慧卿, 王大为, 王春磊, 王长久, 叶子路, 陈一诺. 稠油油藏高温凝胶改善蒸汽驱开发效果可视化实验[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(11): 1421-1426.
[15]	姜彬, 邱凌, 刘向东, 杜定宇, 李雪, 李珂, 陈翰. 固相沉积模型在高凝油藏注水开发中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(1): 101-105.